(The website has now been taken down.)
See other videos in this series for links to old interviews with i-man .
---
Old latin maxim: Whoever owns the soil owns all the way to the heavens and depths of the earth.
Well 1776 was the year the Crown colonies became Crown states. The Declaration of Independence was legal, it wasn't lawful. It was signed on both sides by representatives of the Crown Temple. It legally announced the status quo of the Crown colonies to that of the new legal name called "States", as direct possessive estates of the Crown. The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown. Proof that the colonies were still in Crown possession is use of the word "State" to signify a "legal estate of possession". In other words, if you go back and look up "estate" you will find even in Black's Law dictionary that it has now taken on the term "State". Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and Constitution would have been written by use of the word "states". By use of "State" the significance of a government of an estate possession was legally established.
During the 1788 Virginia debates when Patrick Henry said to the Commission, paraphrased, "what right do you have to say 'we the people' when it should be 'we the states'?" And he said that twice in there.
So all the constitutional rights are simply dictated by the Crown Temple and enforced by the Middle Temple, which are Bar attorneys, through the franchise and corporate government entity aka the Federal United States government. When a state citizen (and I'll put that in capitals) attempts to invoke his constitutional natural common law rights in chancery, they're equity courts, he is told they don't apply. We all know that. Why?
Simply because a state citizen has no rights outside the rule and codes of the Crown law because only a state citizen has natural common law rights by a paramount authority of God. Now it might sound confusing because I just used 'state citizen' two different ways. It's the capitalisation that does it.
So the people that comprise the citizenry of the state are recognised only within natural and common law as already established. That would be God's law.
Only a STATE CITIZEN (capitalised) can be a party to an action within a state court. A common state citizen (I'm going to say habitant instead) cannot be recognised in that court because he doesn't legally exist in Crown chancery courts. In order to be recognised by the state courts a common man must be converted to a corporate entity. That's why they have a legal fiction called a "person" - see The Informer's website. A person is not in law, the physical man. So now you know why they created the entity using all capital letters within birth certificates issues by the state.
The chancery courts/Crown courts, where the decisions of so-called "justice" are decided by three judges, it's the direct result of the Crown Temple having invoked the rule and code over all judicial courts. Every judicial court in this country is not anything to do with this country, it's done with the Crown. It's held by the Crown.
Here's a quote: "It is held to be a settled rule that our courts cannot take notice of any title to land not derived from the state or colonial government, and duly verified by patent." - 4 Johns. Rep. 163. Jackson v. Waters, 12 Johns. Rep. 365. S.P.
So the Crown Temple granted letters patent and charters for all the land and all the colonies of New England, and the King of England, a sworn member of the Middle Temple (as the Queen is now). Since the people were giving their patent/charter corporations, the governors of the colonies had a hard time, especially concerning the Crown taxation. A scheme was devised to allow the Americans to believe they were granted independence. Remember, the Crown Templars represented both parties at the 1776 Declaration of Independence. And not only there, but to the Treaty of Peace. Every one of them was an esquire that signed it. So you've got one party signing both sides. Is that legal?
The reason that declaration was recognized by international treaty law, was in order to establish the new legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, Middle Templar King George III, agreed to in the Treaty of Paris "between the Crown of Great Britain and said United States". Well wait a minute, the Crown of Great Britain is the same as the Crown of the United States. So there's the agreement right there, that is a total fraud.
Most important is the actual signatories of the Treaty of Paris, they were all esquires. This legally signifies officers of the King's court, which are now known as Templar courts or Crown courts. So this is the same Crown Templar title given to Alexander Hamilton.
Loading...
This anybody know where you get a copy of The Informer administrative complaint.
eddieiskp 1 year ago
The Doctrine of Silent Acquiescence...
wind0wninja 1 year ago