Rare Footage - Controlled Demolitions? - South Tower 9/11 - Not The Case?
Loading...
Loading...
1:16
9/11: WTC2 "Collapse" (CNN ImageSource)by Xenomorph911WTC819 views- 0:44
Rare footage of South Tower Collapse.by LolLoosechange291,091 views
- 2:34
9/11 FEMA Videographer fights extradition to U.S.by cappucinokid100963 views
- 6:06
9/11 UAV'S Birds and Missiles.by BrutalTruthMediaMaui6,963 views
- 8:48
World Trade Centre Amateur video from 9/11.part 3.by cappucinokid1008,824 views
- 1:07
Rickard Olsson frågar om porr i Vem vet mestby dixunis323,111 views
- 2:16
FEMA videographer has secret 9/11 footageby thenewsandworldtoday2,093 views
- 0:32
911 Truth TV Spot - NYCCANby AgothInnCloth353 views
- 6:02
9/11 Eyewitness accounts from Ground Zero finally released under F.O.I.A.by cappucinokid100674 views
- 2:07
911 CNN footage before planes hitby tellitlikeitisffs60,910 views
- 2:41
PROOF 'PLANE' WAS HOLOGRAM THAT HIT 9/11by BrutalTruthMediaMaui914,073 views
- 6:07
Glenn Beck & Al-Jazeera TV on "Hezbollah in Mexico"by keywiki4,474 views
- 0:30
Never before seen 9/11 footageby SuzukiRm125Kid379 views
- 1:42
New Footage of WTC 7 Collapse Controlled Demolition Unseen Rareby 911Infowarrior21,485 views
- 1:27
9/11 - INSIDE JOB! Pentagon Aftermath - No Plane!by vengencefrom1979251 views
- 2:54
new 911 rooftop footageby muckletoon21,016 views
- 9:16
Rare Footage from 911by killdasheleven484 views
- 4:27
911 Unanswered Questions Rare Footage.by ConspiracyCentral88,610 views
- 1:39
New Footage of WTC North Tower 1 Collapse Controlled Demolition Unseen Rareby 911Infowarrior5,924 views
- 2:46
US Attempts To Extradite 9/11 FEMA Videographer From Argentinaby Steeper332,896 views
@mlawren7 Yeah and I thought sorry for all people that were trapped inside
Henkeboj90 1 year ago
@Henkeboj90 Yeah, about 9.8 m/s^2 - friction.
mlawren7 1 year ago
Despite my other comments on this thread, I am actually sceptical about the official story. I don't believe there were controlled explosions, but given other evidence, it is possible that the support beams could have been treated with thermate (not an explosive, but a v. high temp. accelerant. It's well known that the asbestos protecting these internal supports was removed years prior, and never replaced with insulation as good. A simple iron oxide/aluminium mix could have helped melt the beams.
mlawren7 1 year ago
Shit! what Incredible fast that Building went down!!
Henkeboj90 1 year ago
@kiaganga How can anybody expect for the building to "collapse" perfectly in response to the chaotic damage from an "airliner crash" when it would take a PERFICT PULL to achieve the observed result.
Charlie666XZ 1 year ago
@DeepSpace8andahalf explosives on every beam +cenral core the perfect pull !!
kiaganga 1 year ago
@mlawren7 yep, ALMOST!
we4x4 1 year ago
@mlawren7 they were 110 stories and fell in about 10 seconds. do the math. less than 1 second per floor. so, can you walk through a closed door as fast as an open one? how about 110 closed doors campared to open ones. pretty F'n obvious that there was NO resistance from below. It's called Newton's Law of Falling Bodies. I really suggest you try to understand it because you are obviously just parroting...
we4x4 1 year ago
How you like them apples CTs
HOW YOU LIKE THEM APPLES.
TheIntelligentest 1 year ago
@mlawren7 I havent seen not heard of any other sky skrapers come down from either planes nor fires...
These 3 towers at the same day and in the same manners aint in the laws of physics..
If it was only one tower that fell, it could have been structual damage, but not all 3 buildings...The hotel in china some years ago burned for 3 days or something, nothing fell there, and WTC burned for a short time...
FromDimmuLand 1 year ago