william buckley threatens to punch chomsky in the face
Top Comments
All Comments (2,413)
-
More infantile-regressive anal-obsessive passive aggressive neurotic-projective textbook homosexual panic from g175wb, posing as (temp'I'arleonem).
Dolomote is a white mineral, you moron. And panegyrics are public speeches of praise, you imbecile.
Yet another errant failure. But one supposes you are used to it...
-
Hey, you dolomite snobs, I am a wolf among you geeks, in sheep's clothing. I simply bought a book entitled "Improve Your Vocabulary in 20 Minutes a Day", and I synthesize these odd, arcane panegyrics on these threads--and you fools fall for it. Such a pack of queer shut ins, the gay Fudge Packer Union, the Brotherhood of Brown Dirt Cowboys you all are on these threads.
I love you.
Anybody up for a backrub (wink wink)?
-
@Faerlon123- reverse snobbery is declasse.
-
SERIOUSLY cringe when I hear upper class bourgeoise people speak English like Buckley. Blargh.
-
Wouldn't any of us?
-
Apparently Phil rejected your offer of man love, g175wb- you seem in quite a snit.
-
Poor g17swb...perpetually stuck on stupid.
A shovelful of ashes, a bucket of filth, a disgrace to his race.
-
@Elmore3141 -- Balderdash! It is just that kind of analysis which convinces me that they have begun to put lead in the drinking water in addition to flouride. Your reasoning is comparable to a brain damaged Down Syndrome mongoloid defective child, or perhaps a resident of California. Boy, this is MY thread, and you failed to ask MY permission and puke your emesis on MY turf. I am God; I am smarter than any of you insolent puer. Visit my channels and see how obsessed I am with this stuff.
Buckley's the only man who could ever threaten to punch you in the face and sound absolutely adorable while saying it!
icarus313 1 month ago 5
@Anonymous61771520 He says people should be less tolerant of bad decision making by their leaders. He finds the public's patience or open-mindedness terrifying. But should we be less tolerant of Democrats, or less tolerant of Republicans? We're back where we started, trying to determine who's right. All I can conclude is that Chomsky wants less quiet discussion and more loud arguing. Even better: less loud arguing and more violent revolution. But, somehow, always in the correct direction.
Elmore3141 1 month ago