Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Paul Mccartney and David Gilmour - Watch in HD

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
23,059
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 19, 2009

Paul Mccartney and David Gilmour - Watch in HD

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Crazy two of my favorite musicians in the whole world together at the same time...

    its awesome!!!!!

  • Gute Musik kann so schön sein! Gute Musik bedeudet, aber auch gute Musiker....deshalb sage ich fantastisch

see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • hell of a lot of talent

  • Not to mention the great Ian Paice on the drums...

  • McCartney should bow down to Gilmour

  • THIS CANT BE LEGAL!

  • the two persons standing on the same stage was so unbelievable for me that i thought it's fake

  • @charpentierjp1 Yeah, I know what you mean, there's no problem whatsoever with having a preference and I wasn't questioning your preference. I was just confused about the other message but it's all cleared up now and yes I'd have them in my band too. By the way, since my original comment, I have listened to loads of McCartney's stuff and I do regard him a lot higher than I did then, Gilmour's still my favourite though!:)

  • @xPORTERLOOx In essence, no, I guess it's not a reason for my preference of Paul over Dave. I suppose that is just a preference that I can't explain. But all in all, I'm trying not to be critical of Dave because he is a great guitarist and a great musician in general. At the end of the day, they can both be in my band if they want in lol

  • Pink Floyd is easily its own genre, so it's like, say, Dave Mustane leaving metal for pop-country. He could do it and do it well, but he wouldn't be comfortable in his own skin and it would be obvious. Paul, George, John, and even Ringo did well without the Beatles because their individualism dictated that. Dave Gilmour and Roger Waters, though semi-successful separate from Floyd, haven't been able to comfortably leave that state of mind.

  • @charpentierjp1 No offence but I don't really get your point, you're saying the Beatles were a three talents coming into one but Pink Floyd are one talent? Surely that's complementing them?

  • I have to disagree. They both have their musical feats, but Paul hasn't let the comfort of his genre hold him back like Dave has. But that's the thing... The Beatles were three talents coming into one (John's lyrical genius, Paul's rhythm and composition genius, and George's melody genius)... Pink Floyd was just, I don't know... one? There was no breaking Pink Floyd up. "Til death do us part" sort of thing, brah...... of course that's not to say Dave doesn't exhibit some fine blues, here!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more