Darwin: Pseudo-Science and Racism
Uploader Comments (BereanBeacon)
Top Comments
-
Is this satire? "Is evolution based on facts or is it just a story we get told in school and read in books?" - there is a mountain of evidence for evolution and little for the historical truth of the bible.
Eugenics is an ideology created by stupid people - where as evolution is a process that plays out without the need for an ideology.
It's not Darwin's fault some people have twisted his ideas.
Racism is wrong no matter which way you look at it - ethically or scientifically.
-
"As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people."
-Adolph Hitler
All Comments (46)
-
How is science a religion? We have faith in nothing. If you ever found evidence contrary to evolution I would give it up.
But there are mountains of evidence for evolution coming in each year. No fossil has ever been found out of place in the record.
Molecular biology has shown more mountains of evidence for it inside each cell in each of us. Nothing has been found in DNA patterns to contradict evolution by natural selection plus genetic drift.
You idiots are why china is beating us.
-
But I also believe the bible is crap too. Both are religions to me.
-
@MemeticFM Actually darwin was the front man and darwinian evolution is an elitists religion.
-
Darwin = proven RACIST
Anyone that doesnt believe that can read what he wrote in his OWN WORDS
Evolution = factually INACCURATE
There is more proof for unicorns and the Easter Bunny then there is for macroevolution/drastic speciation.
Oh wait a minute.....my stomach is hurting. I feel like I may be "magically mutating" into a NEW species.....could macroevolution be right?
Oh, false alarm. I just had to fart. Looks like it was just stomach indigestion lol.
Evolution = FAIRYTALE
-
ummm, the title is very ironic.
-
Its a standard debating technique to make the view you oppose seem immoral (i.e. racist or sexist). So the attempt by you creationists to make us evolutionists seem tainted by racism holds no ice with me.
Of course Darwin held some of the racist and sexist beliefs of his day it would be suprising if he did not. How ever the fact was he also showed disgust for the ill treatment of people based on race. For instance he called for the governor of Jamaica to be prosecuted for tyranny to 'negroes'.
-
IDiots think if they prove Darwin wrong, evolution didn't happen. Wrong !
-
Darwin and evolution say all humans are equal. More religious lies.
Darwin used 'race' to mean 'species' He never said one race was better.
I think we should teach Creationism in schools so we can show the was no global flood and the earth is millions of years old.
-
@Lichtspielhaus234 '''Gravity is a science'' LOL
Gravity is a force, a fact of nature. Science can discribe it with a theory, even thought they don't know what causes it.
Evolution is a process, ruled by the forces of nature. Science has a theory showing how it happened.
I wonder if Thomas Jefferson and George Washington were racists or sexists, if they were does that mean they did not add anything to society. No, if you are going to attack an idea attach the idea not the person behind it.
sweatytoothmadman 4 years ago
sweatytoothmadman, that may be true but an idea proceeds from a person so I am not sure if it possible to seperate them. If people receive praise for their good ideas their name is always included and shouldn't that also apply for the negative ones.
BereanBeacon 4 years ago