Amanda knox evidence Bloody footprint analysis Kercher murder Sollecito vs Guede

Independent analysis of bloody footprint evidence found in the bathroom at the murder scene.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Meredith
• Kercher
• murder
• Amanda
• Knox
• evidence
• Raffaele
• Sollecito
• Rudy
• Guede
• crime
• scene
• analysis
• sceen
• perugia
• italy
• shock
• bloody
• footprint
• foot
• print
• guilty
• or
• not

[simisenti]

@1974Coconut Dear boy, Hell will freeze over before that happens!!! You carry on with your sad fantasy, but I will think of you with a smile when it all comes to absolutely nothing. And it will, ;) Ciao!!

[1974Coconut]

@simisenti Nobody really cares your opinions. There will be a new trial soon, and judge will put Knox and Sollecito back where they belong.And her parents trial is starting soon too.

[chezbamboo007]

@nancylp400 You say the police were ''bad'' in doing their investigation of this case.  The right word to describe the Italian police investigators is INCOMPETENT !!! More incompetent than a butcher doing brain surgery on a human. I would not want to use them not even to investigate the death of a dog.

A Boy Scout would have done a better job than those italian investigators. In fact, what they did is laughable !!!

[simisenti]

@1974Coconut *shaking head in wonder at the stupidity* of course Amandas DNA would have been on the lamp. it was hers!! She would have touched it! Read the report I mention above and remember, the lamp meant nothing it was not even discussed at trial. Because the police got it to help illuminate the room. :)

[simisenti]

@1974Coconut No. The bathroom was BOTH Merediths and Amandas!! Both their DNAs would be found in abundant amounts everywhere in that room. There were NO samples of MIXED blood found anywhere in that room. Go google ' Hellmann Report Wordpress' and read it. And learn the truth! This was the report released 15th December.

[1974Coconut]

Amanda also said in police interview: She did leave her house about 4 p.m that murder day. She said she went to toilet before leaving and there were NO BLOOD of hers or anyone at all. Later, when police found her dna together with Meredith's dna in blood drops from toilet, she has testified she doesn't know where her blood/dna came from. This dna of hers in it proves she is guilty and has touched Meredith's blood that night when she bleeded.

[1974Coconut]

There's Amanda's dna in that room where murder took place: her table lamp was found in there, so obviously there must be her dna all over the lamp. Funny how people seem to deny this and overlook crime evidence to fit their own agenda. In Amanda's room were no other source of light,but that one lamp only, so she's busted. She did it, no doubt about it. They probably used the table lamp to hide evidence or seek more money to steal...

[simisenti]

@1974Coconut You hang on to that thought sweetie...HELL is gonna freeze over in the meantime. ;)

[simisenti]

@nancylp400 nancy...the forensic team did not change shoe covers at all. Any person passing through that house leaves DNA and those shoe covers would have collected others DNA. Also, the amount of DNA found on the bra clasp was so infintesimal that it could not be attributed just to RS but could have been mine or yours. Read the Hellmann report.

[simisenti]

@1974Coconut True dat. Only problem is, you could visit that house once and have your DNA all over the place. Plus the cops did NOT change shoe covers from room to room, DNA transferred plus, it has since been proved that the so called RS DNA found on the bra clasp was so small it could have been yours. Or mine. Read Hellmanns report FGS!