M1 v Iraqi T72

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
86,469
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 4, 2009

A comparison between US Armour and Iraqi Armour in 1991

Category:

Travel & Events

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 33 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (838)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • most of the t72 was " cheap export models " from ussr,yugoslavia,....

  • @macieksoft any t-72 touch abram

    but tank its no a problem problem its crew

    iraquis no have training logisitc and training

    if russia was in tank with su-25t support this cocktail make other resultat

  • iraquis no have any training any logistic and no have air support

    90% of job its make by a-10

    look in 2008 if georgian have last m1a3 its no changes of resusltat if you dont say use material

  • @TheRamiG old

    tank its not a problem, problem its crew if usa have t-72 usa win again m1a1 of iraquis

  • the Iraqi tanks were not only old russian tanks in comparison to modern allied tanks in 1990

    but they were also downgraded export versions by the 70's standars!! till now the Russians never sell state of the art russian technology to any customer. so such analysis as per the above video is simply misleading and rediculous!! Americans never came face to face with real russian weopons or real russian technology

  • first. these are poor monkey models of the real t-72. second. this tank is outdated and is not one of the best tank on the battlefield (if not modernized) third. lets compare a t-72 to an american m60 or m48 patton.. a tank designed in 1974 and not modernized and a crew with poor traning vs a tank designed in 1991 and with a well trained crew.. lets be fair the t-72 is not a bad tank. its just old and the US are lucky to never ever have meet a modern t-72 with a well drilled crew

  • I miss back when being American was a good thing...

  • @John234pwns In one of famous Iraq vs USA battle M1s killed a lot of Iraq'a T72s BMP1s and other vehicles without loosing even one tank! (only one American soldier was killed in M2A2 bradley when he got APFSDS in head but this round been not from T72 but rather from BMP1 whitch alived after APFSDS hit).

  • The gun is very similar in accuracy and caliber, but the ammunition is different (T72 can use HEAT, APFSDS and HEF, some versions can use barell launched ATGMS, M1 can use HEAT, APFSDS, MPAT (with programmable fuse), some versions can use carnister rounds whitch like a huge shootgun)

    T72 cannot kill M1 from any angle, but M1 can kill T72 from any angle. We must also remember that is easy to kill moving T72 by M1 and very hard to kill fast M1 by T72. Also Iraq have poor versions of T72.

  • Facts are following: M1s have thermal sight, only some types of T72 (ex. T72M1) have TIS, but TIS is that T72s are very poor. M1s have great FCS whitch allow it to easyly kill tank when it self is moving and when target is moving too.

    T72s generally do not have lead calculation, but gun is also stabilised and it have rangefinder.

    T72's armor is weak even with ERA, M1's (especially M1A1 HA) armor is multilayer and also some version have ERA (like TUSK variants). So M1s are much more better.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more