Steinberg Cubase 6 Preview - Time Stretching, NAMM 2011

A demonstration of the amazing new time stretching facility in Cubase 6, known as Elastic Pro. Andrew Schravemade from Steinberg gives us a basic walkthrough of this feature as well as many other new features found in Cubase 6 as part of our series of video based around this phenomenal piece of software. This video was shot as part of a sneak pre-NAMM 2011 preview of Cubase 6 at the headoffice of DV (Digital Village).

Category:

Music

Tags:

• Steinberg
• Cubase
• Cubase 6
• NAMM
• NAMM 2011
• elastic pro
• time stretch
• time stretching

[flotopo]

Cubase is the father of them all!

[mcadder]

Tried Cubase for a couple of months now and as a matter of fact Im selling my three macs with pro tools now since I've realized the simple and honest thruth: Cubase is so much better than pro tools, even though I've always used pro tools and have fought on their side. But yes, now im switching sides. PCs are so much more powerful for a much cheaper price. Cubase has really done it this time, everything just works (like win7) and is so fast and simple.

[MikeVeeLA]

@jacintonegro pro tools still blows for midi

[MikeVeeLA]

@mcadder This is true in so many ways. gee, i always wanted to spend 3 grand for 12GB of mac RAM..forget that api 2500 i could have in my rack LOL

[ericcarson1]

Cubase is great, but I'm not understanding his first two examples. They are doing the same thing...no?

[909Thumper909]

Nice way to eliminate most of the program material when demonstrating. I'd like to see you try this where all instruments are playing. I imagine the byproducts would be quite a lot more obvious. This seems dishonest and brings the validity of this video and Cubase's effectiveness into question.

[pirell]

@jacintonegro theres a video on here about using the tape stop effect in protools, its sooooooo easy. this looks very complicated. im using cubase 5, and i wish i got protools. this reminds me of the timewarp feature that cubase again played catchup to protools that had this yrs ago. i just wish if they caught up its as seamless as the other ones. 

[jacintonegro]

@pirell  what version? HD only I've been using protools since it was sound tools, the strenth of Pro-tools has been Audio, until now they are semi decent with midi and virtual instruments. They all Play catch up.

[pirell]

pro tools has had this for yrs, cubase always playing catch up copycat. and protools tape effect is so much easier to work with, not drawing graphs and algorithms and X-files. gaaaash...its music not the space shuttle. why so complicated.

[ageracci]

Cubase 6 came a long way from the time stretch tool to this type of batch tempo editing. Cubase 6 is great made recording, editing, and mixing a hell of a lot easier.