MoonFaker: LRO, Moment Of Truth?

BECAUSE SO MANY PROPAGANDISTS AND INTERNET TROLLS HAVE USED COMMENT VOTING TO POST "THUMBS DOWN" ON ANY POSITIVE FEEDBACK IN GENERAL, AND THUS CENSOR THESE MESSAGES, ALL 'COMMENT VOTING' FOR THIS VIDEO HAS BEEN DISABLED.

Much like Clementine and SELENE before it, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has failed to live up to all the hype about seeing the Apollo relics.

In this video we look at these oh so hyped over photos and point out just how unobservant the propagandists have been with them.

Ralph Earnest Cascarelli René
24th of August 1933 - 10th of December 2008
http://www.ralphrene.com/
Rest In Peace

http://www.moonmovie.com
http://www.billkaysing.com
http://www.ralphrene.com
http://www.moonhoax.us


Jarrah White would like to invite you to see the Apollo 11 footage that Svector, Phantom Wolf and Shane Killian have tried to suppress from public view.

APOLLO XI: THE LITTLE GEM
http://moonhoax.us/littlegem.htm

See also the evidence of faked and suppressed Apollo 10 footage that Mark Gray doesn't want you to see.

FLAGGING THE GEMS
http://moonhoax.us/flagginggems.htm

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Apollo
• Moon
• landing
• hoax
• conspiracy
• theory
• Lunar
• Reconnaissance
• Orbiter
• photos
• photographs
• site
• sites
• Bill
• Kaysing
• NASA
• hoaxed
• faked
• fake
• LEM
• module
• descent
• stage
• shadow
• Jarrah
• White
• JW
• Studios

[kayaking4autism]

Like it or lump it, those Saturn V rockets were built, they flew they went into orbit! Whether or not they went to the moon is of some debate. Armstrong Aldrin and Collins have all been into space, but maybe they didn't walk the moon. If so what was the moon landings a cover for? Was it to put nuclear missiles into orbit to point at Russia or Vietnam?

[Raliams]

It is said that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing and boy is yours so little. The so called tsunami of evidence you reference is nothing more than conjecture and wouldn’t fill a basin. Not one piece evidence you present is conclusive nor does it stand up to even the mildest of scrutiny. The only reason I can think as to why you persist in pedalling these ridiculous myths is that t is for personal gain of some sort , publicity , notoriety ....whatever.

[Pissoffyowpunk]

The best method to get away with a lie is to keep your opponent guessing and confused: ie obfuscate, better be a suspect than caught red-handed. The Pentagon own satellites which can read a newspaper from over a 100 miles up even with the Earth's atmosphere standing in the way and that's what NASA can produce as "evidence" for their Lunar landing? Why the astronots didn't leave something everlasting like a star drawn on the Lunar soil, after all they played golf and taken their rover for a spin?

[MadHighway]

@dudeeful1

The shadows are long and rectangular because: the LM descent stage is about ten feet tall; it's square in shape; and the photo was taken with the sun at a very low angle (sunrise or sunset).

You didn't take THIS into account because you don't understand what you're looking at because you don't know what you're talking about because you don't have an understanding of science, optics, and engineering.

[MadHighway]

AND ... the scientists corrected you that the turnaround time was two days in one case, then you seem to forget being corrected.

Those ARE high-resolution photos. The LM stages are SMALL, get it?

I like how you used the Apollo 17 photo of Split Rock to support your notion that the LRO photos show only boulders, or nothing. You used a photo taken by Cernan on the moon to say that he wasn't there?

Seriously fucked argument there, man.

[MadHighway]

Yes, Jarrah, there are giant perfectly square "boulders" sitting there elevated by four legs above the lunar surface so that they cast long, square shadows. None of the bright points you point out cast such long, regular shadows. Those ARE boulders; the long shadows are descent stages.

In one of those photos, I can see shadows of the LM ascent stage attachment struts!

Anyway, you say the photos are doctored AND simply show boulders? Which is it?

[MadHighway]

"White SANDS"

"stReaming"

"STREAM", not screened

You transcribed your own words perfectly, yet misspelled the two scientists' words repeatedly, and you included a "garbled"--you couldn't ask him to repeat what you couldn't hear? Ok.

When they told you what you didn't want to hear--that the turnaround time was very short, even to two days--you deliver us an airy "ANYWAY."

Wow, fella. You really twist reality to suit your needs.

[saintsdola]

NASA doesnt have live lunar footage from the lro...WHY is that? My lunar footage on my channel outdoes NASA by 50 fold. Go look for yourself. We never went there and never will. NASA are photoshop experts. No live lunar footage all pictures from NASA.

[MachinaSapien]

to bad nasa just released high res photo's of the moon sites, including tracks made by astronauts.YOU =DEBUNKED.

[Jabbah757]

Couldn't believe it, they just act as 5 year old children...