Proudfootz OWNS Penn & Teller part 1

Penn & Teller did a hit-piece on 9/11 skeptics, and I thought I should point out how after all the smoke and mirrors are removed they neither engage a single piece of the evidence uncovered by skeptics nor do they present ANY evidence for their preferred conspiracy theory.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• penn
• and
• teller
• owned
• by
• proudfootz
• debunk
• 911
• debunkers
• magic
• trick
• exposed
• part
• one

[razoodocks]

You owned no one but yourself. You are just demonstrating their points about the conspiracy theorist mindset.

[proudfootz]

@razoodocks

No, I just showed how Penn resorts to fallacious arguments and outright lies.

Why is it would-be debunkers can't take an honest approach?

[razoodocks]

@proudfootz Yawn. You are the same as Creationists who search for gaps in the fossil record as if tiny anomalies in the official account prove your pretty-damn-far-fetched alternative. If 9/11 was an inside job it would require thousands of people to keep it secret. How come no one has let it slip? Maybe because it didn't frigging happen! How could the US govt plan all of this to enable the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? they couldn't even predict the recession! You're just paranoid.

[proudfootz]

@razoodocks

Making a false comparison between me and someone else doesn't save Penn's invalid arguments from being unpersuasive. Nothing 'paranoid' about pointing out the lack of rationality by television performers.

All your rhetorical questions do not constitute an argument.

[proudfootz]

@AstronautJ

If you paid any attention, my arguments are about Penn's fail.

I supplied plenty of support for that argument.

No further burden of proof on me, since I demonstrated what I set out to do.

[AstronautJ]

@proudfootz So... your standpoint is based on nothing. You can't point to anything in support of your argument, there's nothing in the world you can show someone to prove anything, and there's no reason to believe anything you say.

Why do you even make videos? Lol.

You can't even offer anything *against* the truth of the matter. Go ahead, show me proof the events didn't happen how they are accepted to have. I'll wait. Oh wait, you CAN'T.

You just failed burden of proof. Good work.

[proudfootz]

@AstronautJ

Of course there's no proper investigation. As everyone knows the evidence was destroyed before any investigation was underway.

So it's true, you do have nothing to offer.

[AstronautJ]

@proudfootz Ah. So you can't show us anything to support your claims and you have no "proper investigation" to refer to.

You've got nothing.

[proudfootz]

@AstronautJ

Sadly most of the evidence was destroyed.

Impossible to conduct much of an investigation without evidence.

Except in Penn & Teller la-la land.

[proudfootz]

@AstronautJ

This guy wasn't in the buildings during the collapse.

He has no 'special magical powers' to know what happened.

Penn says this guy 'knows' something - shouldn't he prove it instead of just *say* so?