Heidegger: la question de l'être (7)

Fin du reportage

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Martin
• Heidegger
• philosophie
• philosophy

[kepuysac]

afeitate el bigote arqueologo para desprevenidos y nostalgicos!

[nuitoblongue]

Etrange qu'il n'envisage pas qu'on puisse rationnellement critiquer la Technique. Je trouve le reportage plutôt propagandiste. Et je ne crois pas que si la pensée n'a plus de "rapport original à la tradition" ce soit un mal. L'hypothèse d'ailleurs n'est pas pertinente.

[rabmunch]

Actually the essays by Strauss are now available at the Internet Archive for download, along with some shorter essays by Heidegger.

See "archive[dot]org"

[rabmunch]

Ok. Is your name by any chance Anytus, Lycon, or

Miletus?

My motive? to see what kind of interesting remarks or comments I will receive. Indeed, even the most shallow are interesting for their shallowness. Now, I told you to stop bothering me. I shall have Priapus punish you in a manner you won't forget.

[mmoragues]

No, it really is quite simple. Something, I won't claim to know what, drives you to interject all threads with a plea to read Strauss. You don't substantiate this at all, but you insist on Strauss' relevance to EVERY single video about Heidegger. You don't think other authors are worthy of such ridiculous recomendation, probably because you haven't read them. You are just a 'fan' with a particular agenda in mind. And your 'freedom' to advise doesn't make your advise any less inadequate or stupid

[rabmunch]

There is an essential connection between Heidegger's later thought, and his earlier reflections.

Why don't you go ahead & write a scholarly book about it that will gather dust, & stop hounding me? Dangerously misleading? You are soporifically annoying. You simply don't like the fact that YouTube allows freedom of speech, & that I have emphasized publicly the importance of Strauss vs. Heidegger - while you hate or despise Strauss, without (it must be stressed) having read a single word of his!

[Krelianx]

Again, you see. You can't help yourself. You pay no attention whatsoever to what is being specifically discussed in this (the relation between metaphysics and thinking). As for the conflation of this thinking with Heidegger's earlier expectation for a 'second beginning' you confuse what he thought back in the 30's with his later thought, which is substantially different. Again, your attitude is dangerously misleading.

[Kimujix]

Qu'est-ce que tu attends pour révolutionner la pensée si tu as saisi avec autant d'aisance les défauts de nos penseurs pour leur coller des étiquettes si précises?

[lepivert]

Il ne se dégonfle pas, il évolue. On ne peut pas garder les mêmes idées toute sa vie, ce n'est pas possible. A moins d'être complètement sclérosé de la pensée.

[rabmunch]

One must read Leo Strauss' discussion of Heidegger's project for mankind to fully understand what spirit fills this strange man. Strauss explains the movement of Heidegger's thought from Being & Time, to his intimation of a "world religion." It is found in Strauss' essay called "Existentialism" published in 1995; Interpretation,Vol.22,Nr3. If anyone wants this essay, email me, and I will send it to you.