Paul Is Dead - 2 : Comparison
Top Comments
All Comments (186)
-
yeah he was older in the 80s compared to the 60s wtf is this shit
-
Ok, lets look at the last comparison. Here we have Paul's nice baby face from, idk 1964-65? Then we have "Faul"'s older, more wrinkly face. Hmm.. well we know EVERY Beatles was a smoker, and we know what smoking does to people. "Faul" also grew a moustache, which changes appearance DRASTICALLY. Also, since we know that Paul basically took command of Sgt. Pepper's album and production, we can assume that the dude got the appearance of older because of 3 things: Smoking, Stress, and FUCKING AGING
-
When you get a new haircut; do you still look exactly the way you did before? Think not..
And people actually can change through the years
-
oh, and 1:06 that's a process called ageing
-
0:32 they look almost identical!
-
compare ringo's pictures or george's pictures. they have stretched faces also, does that mean they died in 1966 too?
-
he is dead and murdered by the beetles okay, and that is a true imposter, he looks nothin alike paul, faul is an imposter



you cant compare a 1965 picture from one in the 80s jackass
94sband 4 months ago 10
The conspiracy said he died in 1966, so you're showing of the fake taken in 1963 or 1964?? ....... -.- ?
SweetChick10101 5 months ago 4