Do You Give A Toss?

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• army
• iraq
• blown
• up

[parkrc]

Ur a cunt. Just using long words does not mean ur clever because u intwine these words with vulgar words u twat.

[Tothemattresses]

I have no idea what your point is, but you certainly prove that contraception isn't used widley enough

[bigredjeff007420]

i agree with the heart of this rant. but mercenarys are ok? PRIVATE MILITARYS ARE OK? wtf is ur thinking on that. i assume u arnt.

[Tothemattresses]

Ah, the Gurkhas are a slightly different case. Think about Costa Rica and the US, thier soldiers are bascially mercs, but no one bats and eyelid. Ditto the Gurkhas

[TheReligionist]

body armour, etc, are not needed by MPs,

Brown & buddys dont need body armour so its not important

BUT, the money saved by NOT helping our lads come home safely has been spent on £500 handbags and second house morgage payments and all the other fraudulent claims.

they dont give a shit because its not them.

tell them "for every pound they spend on our troops they get a pound."

AND SEE THE MONEY THEN.

if you can read English

thank a teacher

if you can speak English

THANK A SOLDIER.

[roentgen571]

What's really unfortunate is that these sentiments you express are nothing new--we've been facing these problems for decades. The guys who really put it on the line are treated very shabbily by the government who sent them. :-(

[oxcartdays3030]

yeah fine, douchebag. I'm so very embarrassed that you think I said democracy doesn't work. you embarked on a "this guy is saying democracy doesn't work" witch-hunt against me the moment I mentioned that national soldiers don't have any more accountability to the public than private ones. i feel you jumped the gun on that one. your last two paragraphs are some of the gayest attempts at pwnage i've seen in a long while.

[bigredjeff007420]

now i ask u sir, do u not understand the meaning of intellectual honesty, and by proxy the rules of debate, or are u a fiend who would be more at home behind a pulpit that discussing matters of the day with ur equals? i have a feeling u are more worried of being embarrassed than reaching any form of consensus. to that point i must say i humbly agree to disagree. have a nice day.

[bigredjeff007420]

willful ignorance is alive and well, ladys and gentlemen.

read your first comment .

"at no place in this chain of accountability does a larger public have a slice of the pie." said oxcartdays3030.

u are ether arguing that democracy doesnt work for controlling the military or u are a blathering buffoon, who simply opens his mouth and lets words fall out.

[oxcartdays3030]

If you want to argue about armies and soldiers, which come from the population, without talking about who runs them, the political class, then I think you are putting the cart before the horse. Either that or you are already riding in the cart, so the horse isn't even an issue to you. I never mentioned democracy even once. This is the same story regardless of the type of government.

[bigredjeff007420]

i dont know what to say here. i dont want to argue with the ignorant. however i will give u the benefit of the doubt.

your 2 replys are not consistent. in the 1st u assert no soldiers are accountable to the public because democracy doesnt work. in the 2nd u restate ur original point. u also claim that u are correct because fakesagan and Tothemattresses said so.

u change the subject when u assert democracy doesnt work. thats a whole other debate. the underlined issue here is subjective morality

[oxcartdays3030]

You said private soldiers aren't accountable to the public. I said in more words that "public" or "national" soldiers aren't either. Both fakesagan and billy have asserted all soldiers are mercenaries in one way or another. I'm not changing the subject.