YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Play Upload

Space Soundwaves Experiments with ZZ Top Aboard the International Space Station

Phobosuchus1 Phobosuchus1·83 videos
2,032
16,810
Like     Dislike 3

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Phobosuchus1's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Phobosuchus1's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Phobosuchus1's video to your playlist.

Published on May 4, 2012

NASA Astronaut Don Pettit demonstrates water oscillations on a speaker in microgravity, and ZZ Top rocks the boat 250 miles above Earth. Answer the challenge question at www.physicscentral.com/sots for a chance to win a prize and have your name read from space!

Credit: NASA
Source: http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/videog...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • RiderOfGar

    My answer to the challenge question would be that attenuation of sound in water is higher for higher frequencies (in other words, the water more easily absorbs high frequencies.) Thus the alternative is lower frequencies. This is also why (I assume) they use low frequencies to probe the ocean. This is all related to Stokes Law but I haven't taken any of that in Uni yet so I'm not 100% sure.

    Great video! - Nate from Canada

    · 11

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate RiderOfGar's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate RiderOfGar's comment.
  • EdithMildred

    i never wonder what would happen if he played dubstep, at all.

    · 9

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate EdithMildred's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate EdithMildred's comment.
    in reply to grand magus (Show the comment)

Video Responses


All Comments (30)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • tubeshok

    needs more cow bell

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate tubeshok's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate tubeshok's comment.
  • Dingle Bert

    my left ear enjoyed most of the part where he presented the speakers

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Dingle Bert's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Dingle Bert's comment.
  • DjRonTesler

    Well, I believe that the answer to the question has nothing to do with physics. it's simply because the camera shoots at the frequency of 24 frames per second. any frequency higher than that won't be properly caught on tape.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DjRonTesler's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DjRonTesler's comment.
  • IntegralMoon

    Perhaps I'm being too simplistic. Assuming that the speed of sound in water is constant, it would be logical to say that lower frequencies would produce longer wavelengths.

    As the frequency of the sound increases, the wavelength of the disturbance would decrease beyond the point of visibility. This would happen because the surface tension of the water would act as a dampening force which would 'smooth' out the shape of the wave on the surface of the water.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate IntegralMoon's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate IntegralMoon's comment.
  • globaljunglist

    At any point lower frequencies have typically greater amplitudes, causing disruptive jiggling, while higher frequencies may just create finer patterns.

    Cymatics is cool, if you are interested in wave physics I suggest you take the free Physics III course offered by MIT online!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate globaljunglist's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate globaljunglist's comment.
    in reply to globaljunglist (Show the comment)
  • globaljunglist

    Yes this is true, but it's such a tiny droplet of water that high frequencies may not face too much impediment from attenuation. I think you're on the right track, though it may have more to do with simple harmonic oscillation: X=XzedCosine(OmegaT+Phi)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate globaljunglist's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate globaljunglist's comment.
    in reply to RiderOfGar (Show the comment)
  • projectid4

    My answer to the challenge question would be that the lower frequencies have more displacement than the higher frequencies.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate projectid4's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate projectid4's comment.
  • tantoedge

    We have Got to get these boys a bigger budget.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate tantoedge's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate tantoedge's comment.
  • fireskul98

    wow

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fireskul98's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fireskul98's comment.
  • UnwindUK

    hopefully the station's equipment is watertight

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate UnwindUK's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate UnwindUK's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Advertisement
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later