Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Harvey Keitel reacts to "Path to 9/11"controversy

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,156
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 8, 2006

Harvey Keitel´s ( and others) point of view about the ABC miniseries controversy.He plays the main character in the film. Very interesting.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Harvey really isn't comfortable as an interviewee

  • @sssssjjjj1 I am a dyed in the wool democrat and will take neocons over you nut jobs any day of the week and twice on Sunday. There is No PROOF of controlled demoltion. NONE. NADA. Nothing even coming close to proof. Nothing even in the same ballpark as proof. No proof of anyone planting demolitions, or of anything being ignited. The BS about melting points and combustion heat levels is specious cobbling together of nonsensical hooey. Just like the nimrods who believe we never went to the moon.

  • harvey, you must be hungry and broke. If you can't see 911 was control demo you are a complete dumbass. What is wrong with you people. lol you deserve what the neocons are about to do to you and blame others......AGAIN.

  • Why the hell would they make a history documentary with made up "facts"? To me, it is just a deliberate disinformation: there is so much controversy within this 911 labyrinth, that many people end up believing the official "WTC-7 collapsed due to fire" or the "there were holograms instead of planes" story. The more time goes by and the more documentaries about 911 are made, the more difficult is it to actually comprehend what was going on - that is, I think, intentional.

  • Yeah the clinton administration dropped the ball, and now they are trying to cover it up, as is the leftist media by causing confusion to the facts and in some cases lie, and of course Harvey Keitel admits he isn't sure one way or the other. Think about it, bin laden didn't just put all this together in the short time bush was in office when it happened, who do these libs think they are kidding. The bush inherited a problem because clinton was too busy with cigars and white water, bottom line.

  • Sandy Berger the convicted classified document thief?

    What was he hiding?

  • what foreign policy? whenever someone bombed, killed some of us we just made up a farce of a invesitgation.

  • The scene with Sandy Berger refusing to pull the trigger on Bin Laden is made up? That's not what Buzz Patterson says in his book. He was the man with the "nuclear football", the strike codes that only the president can have and was with Pres Clinton or in close proximity at all times. He said that Berger could not get Clinton on the phone because he was on the golf course and refused to answer until too late. Release the film and let the American People see it. It should be demanded.

  • OUR FOREIGN POLICY DID.

  • I remember watching this on abc, and it does depict how the Clinton presidency let the American people down.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more