Monica Dennington

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,796
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 20, 2009

I have been working on this video for about 2 weeks and could not find the time to finish it. I hope my point is made clear.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 36 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (DefendingCalvinism)

  • Bottom line is there is a long line of popes going back to St Peter . Catholics knew

    this . There was no Holy Bible till 397 and few owned one till the 1800's when people learned to read . This is why all the protestants bicker .

    I can tell who is a real Catholic bro if I know them . If they are making a effort /getting to confession /mass that's a Catholic . NOT necessarly saved

    Jesus said pray unceasingly , I don't pray enough so I might not be saved

  • @SAYYOURROSARY So now you say there was no Bible till 397? What off the ancient manuscripts and those bound with other Scriptures before then that have been found? Did not the Church Fathers provide listings of accepted books by the Church before then even apart from a Council? Your Church History is extremely fuzzy. This is to be expected when you are told what to believe unquestionably or be damned. You must want us to go back to the Dark Ages since learning to read causes bickering.

  • It's sad to see the blind leading the blind . Both wrong , both outside the church .

    Neither one can have a final say about what the "bible" says . Neither have a way to know for "certain" that's what the Bible says Neither can be proven right or wrong .

    That's what you get with protestants , 6000 different denoms ! 6000 different opinions Now NON denom is the big up and comer ...so sad .

    BUT everybody is "saved" so it's all cool ?

  • @SAYYOURROSARY So Protestantism is the "blind leading the blind" not having "a way to know for certain" what the Bible says? If this is so, why should I become a Catholic seeing that both Popes and Councils as authoratative standards often contradict each other? Can you point me to one place where the Church has infallibly interpreted Scripture? So much for your way to know for certain. Even your group teaches that we are saved but just seperated brethren according to Vatican II--Paul1T2Day

see all

All Comments (545)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @excatholics Calvinism is Christianity, Chumps!

    You guys with your addled brains and your CONSTANT denying the truths of God's word, are going to answer for the stuff and filthy treasonous nonsense you have been putting out over the years about Biblical Chritianity. You and your chums that have fallen for your false man centred doctrine do all in your power to deny the Sovereignty of a HOLY, RIGHTEOUS and JUST God. Your careless words make you slaves to the rubbish you spout!

  • @ChristiansofAsia Ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa - tht;s the funniest thing I have read in decades. It should be put forward as a candidate for the "Funniest comment on YouTube".

  • PWNAGE haha

  • i want to learn what you got to teach to learn about GOD and JESUS OK see you soon contact me by my email thanks i know that the time is near

  • how can i get in contact with you ?

  • can i have your contact please monica so i can go to your church in england its ok?

  • @SAYYOURROSARY if you pay close attention to what is recorded in history concerning Catholicism you would see that even "protestants" were Catholic. They protested some Catholic doctrine but never denounced the "holy mother church" or any of the catholic teachings that are clearly against scripture (ie... Mary as co "redemptress" or Eucharist doctrine).

  • "You smile more than Joel Osteen." LOL. But...sad at the same time.

  • @MindRenewal Oops. I must've read the wiki entry totally wrong.

  • @Danielezerable If you're referring to Servetus, when the Geneva city council found him guilty of heresy and had him burned at the stake, Calvin was just asked to testify at his trial. Calvin wasn't even a citizen of Geneva at the time and didn't have the authority to condemn the man. In fact, he tried to convince the council to execute him in a more humane way, by beheading (which is still harsh, but better than burning).

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more