Will Arizona Change Its Gun Control Laws?

10 January, 2011 MSNBC

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• arizona
• gun
• control
• jared
• lee
• loughner
• serial
• killer
• shooter
• extended
• magazines
• access
• clip
• calibre
• pistol
• high
• scope
• weapon
• range
• target
• firearms
• keith
• olbermann
• government

[darthcollosus]

@theARMORYchannel thank you pete!!!!! i cant believe how ignorant these people are.... how can u blame an inanimate object for committing a crime its foolish.

[theARMORYchannel]

the guns not the problem. its the dudes brain!! get some comin sense.

[CornFedArmen]

“Never retreat Nancy, just reload. The most productive Speaker of the House in modern history has no reason to retreat from leading her caucus...Republican­'s cannot point to a single legislativ­e success in the last two years... For now, they are all puffed up over their recent elections, but they had better study their history... they will [not] hold on to the...majority for long.”

Posted on the Huffington Post 2 months ago & still on the Huffington Post to this day.

[Live2Excel]

@IranContraScumDid911 While we seem to disagree about whether The Constitution and/or Bill of Rights expressly permitted slavery and prohibition. I think its clear, while I understand your assertion that the Bill of Rights seemingly inherently forbade this doesn't seem to reconcile with the need for the 13th and 21st. I'll end our dialogue with this, America is a great nation because of the 2nd Amendment gun right - AMERICA WILL SOON BE AN EVEN GREATER NATION DESPITE 2ND AMD GUN RIGHTS.

[Live2Excel]

Yes, yes they are now. I'm concerned that it seems revisionist. I certainly mean not to insinuate that you deny our ugly past in regards to slavery. The Constitution went into effect in Mar 1789 but the BofR was not until Dec 1791. Its clear what our forefathers intended or else why include language that deemed non-whites 3/5 a person if the BofR truly applied to anyone other than Caucasians - at the time. Let me come full circle. I guess my original point in this whole dialogue is this:

[rightsman123]

I don't think a glock is a "Assault Weapon" olbermann. And putting a AR-15 at the beginning of the news real is some nice subliminal messaging. He must not know that the National Crime Victim Survey estimated that guns are used defensibility 100,000 times a year. And other reports have it at 2.5 million times a year. With 2 million Americans in jail, that seems probable.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@Live2Excel We both agree that blacks are citizens of the US, and are protected as such. Indians were also treated the same way, not because the Constitution permitted it. They have the same rights, as natural born humans. Muslims are currently focused on in our country, a clear violation of the first amendment. The rights protect you from an oppressive government, at least they did before they rewrote it in 2003 because of 9/11.

[Live2Excel]

@IranContraScumDid911 Despite the freedoms demanded in the Declaration and the freedoms reserved in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, slavery was not only tolerated in the Constitution, but it was codified.

[Live2Excel]

@IranContraScumDid911 I think we're getting somewhere sir. Thank you for continuing to indulge me. I just read the ENTIRE Constitutionalist Platform as produced by The Constitution Society. Interesting, quite frankly, somewhat noble. This belief insists that rights recognized in BofR precede all others, all times and everywhere. Please note that I better understand your assertion about the BofR but after research about our founding fathers I submit this to you: continued

[IranContraScumDid911]

@Live2Excel I am a constitutionalist, it is the foiundation my political belief ...... The bill of rights IS part of the constitution.