Tether Incident NASA STS-75 UFO
Uploader Comments (MicheleLee777)
All Comments (1,369)
-
well all i can say isgoing>>what more evidence do u people want and what are you going to do about this 1996 outdated ufo stuff..
-
No i'm not comparing myself to Einstein. Once again you show your lack of intelligence. The point is, your stupid half baked arguments are actually against such renowned physicists, not me. The laws in question stand well enough to this day, and you're not in a position to question them. I happen to know how to apply them that's all. You don't know how to apply them, don't recognise their influence in these videos, and don't respect anyone who does.Your loss
-
@MoronAntidote Ohh man!! Now hes comparing himself to Einstein. Get your head out of the clouds ya muppet !!
-
No, you clearly cannot grasp the very obvious fact that nothing is actually stopping. That's something to laught at.
The shuttle (and camera) is travelling at about 17500mph. If something stopped, how long do you think it would remain visible? This is the problem with you - you are thick. You cannot think in relative or 3D terms. For this reason it would not matter if Einstein himself was writing this - you'd still argue, and you'd still be wrong. Learn!
-
@MoronAntidote and you clearly cannot explain how these objects stop on the spot and then go continuing on their path again. Orbital mechanics (LMFAO). Not this time. You are clearly an arrogant self proclaimed know it all moron who cannot accept the fact that these may be intelligently controlled and therefore your opinion is simply just that . YOURS!!
-
It doesn't matter whether or not you 'buy' an explanation, when that explanation conforms with the current state of a certain field of physics, namely orbital mechanics. You are merely an amateur on YouTube, you clearly don't understand orbital mechanics, or the complexities of the ionosphere, and therefore your opinion is void.
Science learns better and faster than you. Keep up or shut up.
-
if NASA say it is ice particles than it is ice particles you assholes
-
David Sereda refers to the small flying disc that the FBI found in someone's back garden, it had the same notch as the anomalies in this video and was traced back to some 12 year old boy who made it. Coincidentally it looks identical. However, if these anomalies are ice particles or dust or space debris or whatever then how is it that the Tucson, AZ videos and UK videos of UFOs from the ground look exactly the same??
-
Well the fact that you don't see ay of these ANOMALIES from the side suggests that this hole in the center and slot at 5:00 o'clock IS a camera affect but that doesn't disprove that these objects aren't intelligently controlled. They stop, go change direction and in sharp angles at that. I really don't buy this low atmosphere explanation that some MORON tries to feed you. Ice crystals from my ass to your mouth bitch.
-
energy patterns? could also be attributed to focusing in and out rapidly, no?
well-defined notch? has UFO been bitten? help me out here, where is the two plus two = (play stargate intro)
Personally I am waiting for natasha henstridge to take me out back and show me what i was really made for
CRAP! Not doubting this happened but bothered by the lack of points of reference with this video such as turning camera towards earth or someone else and panning into the current shot so we can get a clearer view of it from varied perspective. Man, this sucks
mstarcruiser 8 months ago
@mstarcruiser David Sereda investigated this. You can see his findings by searching for the video " UFO- Evidence The Case For NASA UFO's (part 1 & 2) He went over cameras used, measurements of distanced and more. Here is one I found youtube.com/watch?v=r5G62XmiHkc
MicheleLee777 8 months ago
@MicheleLee777
MicheleLee, be careful about presenting Sereda's version of events, because there is a wealth of evidence to suggest he was either deliberately dishonest, or just inept at research. One thing is certain, he is certainly inept when it comes to technical matters, so even if he was honest (doubtful imo), his views should be taken with a hefty pinch of salt.
I have no beef with you, because you seem geniunely interested in getting to the bottom of this, but please be careful :)
MoronAntidote 8 months ago
@MoronAntidote The information in his presentation explains a bit more as to what cameras were used. I do not suggest anything other than that. I have my opinion on him, and it does not lean toward a positive one. People are suggesting this is fake when it is actual footage from NASA. Thank you for pointing it out because I didn't have the guts to do that in public. We used this footage for other reasons (camera/graphic design) and it turned out to be a pretty big discussion about UFO's.
MicheleLee777 8 months ago