The Photoshop Effect: Part 2 Controversy

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,645,149
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 24, 2008

Find out if Sarah thinks Photoshop should really be banned! You'll be surprised by her answer. http://diet.com/videos/

In Part 2 of The Photoshop Effect, investigates the ethics behind retouching photos and what fashion magazines can do to help bring awareness about the prolific use of photo retouch. Produced and hosted by Sarah Dussault.

Special thanks Tim Lynch Photography, Alexis Beck and Tom Fauls.

Check Out Diet.com Video!
Diet.com: http://www.diet.com/videos
Subscribe to Our YouTube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=diethealth
Go behind the scenes w/ Sarah's Blog- http://www.diet.com/dietblogs/read_blog_expert.php?uid=557164
Twitter http://twitter.com/DietHealth
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/dietcom
iTunes: http://tinyurl.com/6kcuag
Sarah's YouTube Channel - http://YouTube.com/SarahsFabChannel

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • just put the Adobe PS logo on photo's

  • 0:41

    Her posture is the same as everyone watching this video.

see all

All Comments (4,053)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'd let this chick sit on my face..

  • @quakepsp Men are masturbating at their computer.

  • No, you can't ban Photoshop. That's so unrealistic, because photographers are artists and Photoshop is a tool used to create their artwork. Maybe instead of a "warning label", which may be seen as an insult to the models, the retouched photos could give credit to the photographer and present such photos as the creations they are. Photos could say "created by" or something like that.

    Besides, people need to support and help their friends, family and significant others who have poor self-esteem

  • @dkidane i dont get it....

  • @jamieblaise actually from a historic pov and a genetic pov it -does- make better men and it -does- benefit the genepool. You cannot go around claim you are an indiviual when you share a planet with 6 billion others, the pack will have expectations of you.

  • i think they need to put a disclaimer on all newspapers and TV news when they're reporting political news, now THAT is distortion you need to be worried about.

  • yes ban it

  • @aleatharhea I think that you're overlooking all the other things that are reinforced in boys. Get a job, support your lazy wife, work until you die, masculinity, hide your tears, be tough and protect everyone, etc. Does this make our men better? The answer is in setting your own expectations, not allowing society to tell us how to live our lives.

  • @ThatsBullSchitt Exactly! It's on the individual to take responsibility for their own choices, not to start blaming others. If someone wants to get pretty by lowering everyone else's standards then they are going to be waiting a long time, lol...They might as well start working on themselves while they're waiting...

  • I would like to see one naturally beautiful woman try to claim that there is something wrong with photoshopping a picture. Let's be realistic, almost every woman wears make up, and you don't force women to wear a sign that says, "Hey guys, I'm really ugly as sh!*" Beautiful people are beautiful because they are uncommon, common people look common because they are common! Ask any man or woman what the most attractive feature is in their eyes... Confidence! You can't photoshop that!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more