Bryan Spencer Speaks about Rigging St. Charles Caucus

Bryan Spencer, Former St. Charles County Republican Central Committeeman and Caucus Subcommittee Chairman, admits to premeditated rigging of the St. Charles County Caucus.

Spencer is also running for Missouri State House of Representatives in District 63. We must not allow him to win!

This video was recorded surreptitiously on Monday, March 19 - two days after the caucus and three days before it was decided to be rescheduled - at a Pachyderms meeting.

At 2:34 he says "into the sausage" instead of "into the caucus." Sadly, it's the same thing either way. He doesn't want people to see the caucus, he doesn't want media to be there, he wants the blind-folds to be on everyone. In context, he's saying "I don't want people to see what goes into making the caucus."

Video Without Subtitles: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB9mfJ...
Entire Caucus: http://youtu.be/GM-K9PpMi2w

• Category

  Nonprofits & Activism

[medullabeast55]

It boggles my mind that videos like this are out there for the public to see, yet no one makes a big deal about it. News stations will make a big deal out of a celebrity dying, yet something monumental like this is completely ignored. What does it tell you about our media and government that this shit is ignored? 

[thunder9968]

Bryan Spencer should officially be charged with douchebaggery! 

[verbalbile]

lol@ "Into the sausage"

[Alex Walker]

Just watch it, moron. Does it sound like it was cut in the middle of a sentence? All the times you mentioned at the beginning even don't land in the middle of a sentence. You better be glad this wasn't something bigger, because even he admitted to this video, so you would've eaten up Nixon's excuses despite all evidence. Ha!

[krispy0001]

Yes, Oh Great One, after all conversation of this this happening months ago, you saying get out makes so much sense. "Get out of a conversation that's already over, guys" Derp de derp. I was out, dude. Had been for months.

[krispy0001]

How are we supposed to know you didn't cut in the middle of any sentences? You obviously cut and pasted parts of the video, and there was more than enough shaking to hide cuts like that. We just supposed to trust you? I believe that's what gullible what be(least that's what the dictionary says) as opposed to gullible being a healthy skepticism (which is the opposite of gullible) and pointing out heavy editing.

[Alex Walker]

Because you're gullible enough to think that editing changed anything. Every video in existence is 'edited', I didn't cut in the middle of any of his sentences, I edited it so you don't have to watch 40+ minutes of people eating dinner. He's asked a question, he answers it, do I really need to show you him walking to his car in order for you to believe he really answered the question?

[krispy0001]

Why? Because I mention what should be an obvious fact?

[takon074]

".I am not a film/photography student either"

Again, GET OUT.

[takon074]

get the fuck out

[Alex Walker]

Edits are only relevant if we make a point by stringing together sentences. Spencer said the same thing when he was asked about the video - but that's just because he thinks the people are morons and will believe it. The points he makes are by themselves, such as not wanting the media to be there, and has nothing to do with the editing! Bringing it up would imply the point is only made BECAUSE of the edits. It's just more of the politics "Hey look over there" instead of talking about issues.

[Antoine Hage]

Gary Johnson 2012!