YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Mutiny on the Bounty - Trailer [1935] [8th Oscar Best Picture]

MoviesHistory MoviesHistory·287 videos
7,767
58,380
Like     Dislike 2

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like MoviesHistory's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike MoviesHistory's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add MoviesHistory's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Apr 22, 2009

The Bounty sails from Britain for Tahiti to obtain a cargo of breadfruit plants. Captain Bligh is in charge and he over-zealously enforces discipline by various methods, his favorite being flogging. Bligh cuts rations and works his men so hard that even first mate Fletcher Christian finds him hard to comprehend. In Tahiti, Christian and good friend midshipman Byam become involved with native women Maimiti and Tehanni. Tahiti is paradise compared to life on the Bounty under Bligh. When the Bounty is loaded and sets sail to return, the harsh treatment by their Captain is too much for the crew and Christian leads a mutiny. They set Bligh and his supporters adrift on a boat and return the Bounty to Tahiti. What they did not count on is the Captain's return. Written by Gary Jackson
[IMDB.COM]

Release: 8 November 1935
Running Time: 132 min
Awards: Won Oscar. Another 1 win & 7 nominations
Producers: Albert Lewin, Irving Thalberg
Director: Frank Lloyd
Writers: Talbot Jennings, Jules Furthman, Carey Wilson
Cast: Charles Laughton (Bligh), Clark Gable (Christian), Franchot Tone (Byam), Herbert Mundin (Smith)
Genre: Adventure, Drama, History
Domestic Total Gross: $ million
Worldwide Total Gross: $ million
[IMDB.COM][BOXOFFICEMOJO.COM]

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • mindspring57

    In many respects, this movie is far better than the 1962 remake.

    · 17

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mindspring57's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mindspring57's comment.
  • PeterFirthFan

    This is by far the best version.

    · 11

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate PeterFirthFan's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate PeterFirthFan's comment.

All Comments (71)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • beauferret

    Wow a production budget of $2million. Imagine what they'd think of Hollywood today.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate beauferret's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate beauferret's comment.
  • voicegirl555

    Clark Gable should have got the Oscar for this film. He was really a very good actor! You don't see his kind anymore. He left us 52 years ago today and the world hasn't seem right since.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate voicegirl555's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate voicegirl555's comment.
  • emofolkie

    I'm a big Gable fan so I'm glad that many people think his performance here is better than Brando's in the remake, even though he's not as highly regarded as Brando as an actor.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate emofolkie's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate emofolkie's comment.
  • LINDA LEAR

    FRANCHOT TONE is the BEST thing in the movie, Bravo Franchot !

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LINDA LEAR's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LINDA LEAR's comment.
  • Furgi1064

    Those disobedient sailors deserved to be punished!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Furgi1064's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Furgi1064's comment.
  • Kolaveri Di

    you are right! I would think the makers pumped in lot of money into the project considering none other than Marlon Brando (one of my favourite actors) would carry it on his own. But unfortunately the film tanked

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kolaveri Di's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kolaveri Di's comment.
    in reply to mindspring57 (Show the comment)
  • mindspring57

    I agree. The 1984 is the most historically accurate. The 1962 version has a lot of problems, not the least of which is that Brando, unlike Gable and Gibson, was never shirtless, and we are expected to believe that, apparently, he had sex in the bushes in full naval uniform. The 1962 has gorgeous scenery, and it is a good catalogue of the various naval punishments (e.g. flogging, keelhauling, etc.)!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mindspring57's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mindspring57's comment.
    in reply to Kolaveri Di (Show the comment)
  • Kolaveri Di

    yes but historically flawed. 1984 version is closer to history with powerful performances from Antony Hopkins and Mel Gibson esp the former.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kolaveri Di's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kolaveri Di's comment.
    in reply to mindspring57 (Show the comment)
  • buzzlolyear

    they should ve gave clark gable an oscar for this movie same with charles laughton

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate buzzlolyear's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate buzzlolyear's comment.
    in reply to PeterFirthFan (Show the comment)
  • Ricardo62459

    never

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Ricardo62459's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Ricardo62459's comment.
    in reply to mindspring57 (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later