Bush Helps Dedicate Pentagon Memorial

At the dedication of a memorial at the Pentagon, President Bush remembered those who lost their lives there on September 11th, 2001. (Sept. 11)

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• bush
• pentagon
• dedicate
• memorial

[USA04July1776]

God bless America and the souls of the departed. Respects Mr. President.

[ramcdaniel1]

LOL. No, I am just constantly amazed at the idiocy of you lame America bashers. Must be awful to hold so much envy of us.

[WillShakespeare2007]

@loosechangeexposed How is your conspiracy theory about Saddam any different? You have no proof. That is why we agree the burden of proof lies with you - the conspiracy theorist.

[loosechangeexposed]

@WillShakespeare2007 the conspiracy theorists are the people who blame the gov't for being in on the conspiracy to cause, plan, and pull off 9/11, they have no proof so the theorize about people who they blame that are part of that conspiracy. i am somone who is calling them out, exposing them for having no proof of conspiracy, lying and hiding the truth. they are the ones who need to prove it was an inside job, the burden of proof lies within the accusers. not me, i have proof.

[WillShakespeare2007]

@loosechangeexposed "The burden of proof lies with the conspiracy theorists" - finally something we agree on. You are the conspiracy theorist so the burden lies with you. You just have a theory about Saddam with no proof - this is a conspiracy theory. Please quote from one of my messages where I suggest I think 9/11 was an inside job? I just politely said I agreed with you on this and said good luck convincing others. I am not "afraid" of your videos - I have a life and can not be bothered.

[loosechangeexposed]

@WillShakespeare2007 NO YOU WIMP, i challange you to comment on my videos, if i am so wrong then it should be easy to prove me wrong, the burden of proof lies with the conspiracy theorists who claim inside job, they started the claims without proof or evidence, i am the one exposing them as liars and frauds, i explain how they are wrong and they (including you) need to prove how they are right, a good place to start would be with my videos, but you seem to be afraid to comment on them, why? why?

[WillShakespeare2007]

@loosechangeexposed "you can't prove I am wrong", please read about "Russell's teapot". The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim not with me. Look we will never agree on this one thing so lets just leave it. I am happy you think 9/11 was a terrorist attack that is enough. Good luck convincing others of that.

[loosechangeexposed]

@WillShakespeare2007 i know i am right about saddam getting revenge for desert storm, and i am also right about everything in my videos, you can't prove me wrong, go ahead and try, and you can't prove that saddam wasn't behind the attacks, if 9/11 and saddam had no relation why did Bush go after him in the first place? do you know how to read between the lines? gov'ts are not going to put the blame on someone when there is not enuf proof, "we had a hunch" doesn't cut it in the real world.

[WillShakespeare2007]

@loosechangeexposed You just repeated yourself without responding. Why can't the US or other governments say "we know he was involved but don't have solid proof". That's what they said before the war. Why why why? It is not a court, they can say what they like. Bin Laden is a fall guy? Then why didn't he claim responsibility for the attacks? I am not interested in your videos - you self promoting wannabe. You do not even answer simple questions, so I will leave you to it.

[loosechangeexposed]

@WillShakespeare2007 my book explains all the details.

the reason the gov't can't pin it on saddam is because of lack of evidence, they can't just say we think he is guilty, they have to have solid proof, and the reason they can't link him to the attacks is because he got bin laden as the fall guy to cover his tracks, if you think he wasn't involved, that he didn't want revenge on the U.S. for desert storm, he also out smarted you. here is a challange for you, try commenting on any of my videos

[WillShakespeare2007]

@loosechangeexposed Utter rubbish, Bush's government did claim there was a link to Saddam and then admitted they were wrong. Why could they not claim he was involved? Why would it matter? He is a criminal that is dead. You claim I am gullible it seems you need no evidence for any of your claims. You are the gullible one for believing Bush in the first place. Bush himself now says Saddam wasn't involved. You have zero evidence but you seem not to care.

[loosechangeexposed]

@WillShakespeare2007 saddam didn't admit to it, he would have been a sitting duck, no real proof is why the gov't officials don't claim that he did it either, they can't just say we think strongly that he did it, think about how easy it would be to cover saddam's ass by getting a front man like bin laden, and having him take the credit.

why do you think Bush went after him? believe me he got his revenge for desert storm.

people like you being gullable also helped him, out of sight out of mind.