Response: Top 7 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunked

This is a video response to RKOwens4 video "Top 7 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunked".
Here's my source information:

7. http://www.flight93crash.com/

6. http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm

5. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silverstein_pullit.html

4. http://www.populist.com/03.07.burns.html

3. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/asbestos.html

2. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html

1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PawC4u1U7k

FEMA Report Appendix C:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/metallurgy/WTC_apndxC.htm

more info at:
http://911research.wtc7.net/
http://www.911truth.org/
http://www.sf911truth.org/flyer2.pdf

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• debunking
• 911
• 9/11
• lies
• truth
• facts
• science
• scientific
• evidence
• NIST
• conspiracy
• theory
• theories

[CCRider100]

I stoppped watching this drivel after one minute with the statement "in my years as a researcher I never heard anyone make the claim that no wreckage was found of flight 93"

The Loose Change boys made that claim, Flight 93 did not even crash, it landed at Cleveland airport. Of course, given their proclivity to change stories with ease, I not sure which version of the "truth" they are peddling today.

Regardless, there is one claim that no wreckage was found of flight 93

[WillSee11]

@ExposeTheTwooferCult There was a question I posed to you many posts back in our discussion. You never answered. WHERE is YOUR degree in Architecture or Engineering? Will you post your position and website with your name like the Architects and Engineers have done? Let's see! Perhaps you should change your handle to "GraspingAtStraws911Debunker" since everyone can see the emperor is naked here.

[WillSee11]

@ExposeTheTwooferCult I repeat: "Your comments are so obviously lame." How many Actual Structural Engineers, is a "handful"? Did you also count civil engineers" Here is the definition of civil engineers from Wiki: Civil engineering is a professional engineering discipline that deals with the design, construction, and maintenance of the physical and naturally built environment, including works like roads, bridges, canals, dams, and buildings. Do you they UNDERSTAND PHYSICS?

[ExposeTheTwooferCult]

@WillSee11

Two things:

1. AE911Truth stands for Achitects and Engineers (NOT Strucural Engineers) as you seem to keep adding. There are less than a handful of actual Stuctural Engineers on AE911Truth. Good work on that one.LMAO!!!

2. "that IS peer review" Yes, for a bunch of hacks who can't get anything actually published and peer reviewed, you are correct that is simply all they have left. I am pretty sure you just insulted Ae911Truth. Good work!!! Freaking hilarious bro!! Classic

[WillSee11]

@ExposeTheTwooferCult Opps you are correct. I was INCORRECT when I said it was 1,648 Architects and Engineers demanding a NEW 911 investigation. It is ACTUALLY 1,658. (TEN MORE added recently) I can't keep up with it they are growing so fast. Sorry. This is PEER review of your nonsense and LIES.

[WillSee11]

@ExposeTheTwooferCult Your comments are so obviously lame. If 1,648 Architects and Structural Engineers have reviewed the forensic evidence, after listening to NIST and nonsense form people like you, that IS peer review. BIG TIME. NIST does More to DESTROY their own credibility with your "column 79 computer animation", and all the lies from John Gross and Shyam Sunder. I was referred to AE 911 Truth by a friend of mine who IS NOT on the list! There are more than 1,648.

[ExposeTheTwooferCult]

@WillSee11

Anyone can sign a petition. Real scientist produce and publish their work in legitimate peer reviewed journals. 1600 is pretty good though. At that rate they might reach 1% of the engineerng and architecural community before you die. Gage needs to make a living somehow.

[ExposeTheTwooferCult]

@WillSee11

"Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth has grown to over 1,648 Architects and structural engineers,"

I see compulsive lying is your strong suit. Better reread what you wrote. Oh and let me know when just ONE manages to publish just one peer reviewed engineering refutation of ANY part of the NIST report. Heck name five of the structural engineers on your list of 1500 who have publicly stated that structural damage and fire was insufficient to cause the failures on 9/11.

[WillSee11]

@ExposeTheTwooferCult There are more and more people seeing through your lies everyday. Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth has grown to over 1,648 Architects and structural engineers, Alex Jones is expanding on AM and FM radio stations everyday and becoming number 1 in major markets. You are not fooling anyone, just making a further clown of yourself. The laughter of a fool is like thorns crackling in the fire. It doesn't last long before it burns to a crisp.