WTC2 South Tower on 9/11 Molten Metal North-East Corner

Molten metal seen pouring out from the north face (near north east corner) around floor 80 of the WTC2 South Tower on 9/11, timed at a few minutes before the total destruction of the building (around 9:57am).

There is also evidence of iron rich spheres in dust samples tested by Professor Steven Jones and other labs, that matches those produced by the incendiary thermate.

More about the forensic evidence at :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMhl-S...

--

High quality version available for download at :

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=N4QBQFP8

---

To know more about 9/11, please visit...

- http://www.911blogger.com/
- http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/
- http://loosechange911.com
- http://thepentacon.com/

There are many other great websites, including...

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/
--
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
http://stj911.org/
--
Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement and Government Officials Question the 9/11 Commission Report
http://patriotsquestion911.com/

--- Thanks and best wishes
It has the appearance of molten iron caused by a thermite/thermate reaction.

• Category

  News & Politics

[thalescamilo]

change that, YOU are not listening, should it try once. oh, and Think as well

[angusmcpherson]

molten aluminum does not glow when molten. I know because I did castings in industrial arts with molten aluminum. It's steel, and that's all there is to it.

[RavenPrecept]

What colour is molten copper? The metal not the flame.

[4hpook]

You are misunderstanding physics, then. The light generated when a metal is glowing hot is indeed composed of the same bands of the spectrum as are seen when the element colors a flame. This is how we know what elements exist in a star, for example.

[4hpook]

By the "truthers'" own logic, it was not hot enough up there to melt steel, so what makes more sense rationally - that it was molten aluminum from the tons that were up there in heat that WAS hot enough to melt it, or that some nefarious team of conspirators set charges of thermite to melt the steel in some bizarrely complex plot to fool the world? Which one seems more rational? It is clearly molten aluminum.

[RavenPrecept]

You say molten aluminium because you want it to be. If it were molten steel it would look the same as we see here. If it were molten aluminium it would have flowed away from the heat source as soon as it were molten and hence would not look like this. The steel would not flow until it looked like this.

[RavenPrecept]

My answer to this is missing, so again;

When an element is heated in a Bunsen flame it colours the flame according to the colours given off by it's electron shell and is specific to the element. However when a solid or liquid metal is heated the colour comes from the motion of the molecules themselves which is what temperature is. This is the same for all materials that are not giving off light from their electron shell jumps. An LED gives off light due to electrons not heat and hence is cold.

[V4nd4d]

Agree...

Molten steel and thermite...no doubt!

[V4nd4d]

You have no idea what you are talking about. THere is alot of chemical evidence all over the area that thermite was used...Also...you can by the naked eye see that its not molten aluminium pooring out...

[Rich Tuttle]

There are many Government GDAs on here that have expertly stated that what you are seeing if a Mixture of Burnt paper and get this Molten Water! NO shit one said that! ALSO Aluminum odes NOT GLOW RED/WHITE HOT UNTIL it is just above the same temp STRELL does. Its melt and looks like Mercury!SO if its red hot glowing STIll it could never get that house in the tall house fire!