Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Senator Objects To Historic Prayer

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
558 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 26, 2012

Minnesota State Senator Scott Dibble objects to the reading of a prayer that was the first prayer given in the US congress in 1774. Senator Dibble reminds the body that the Minnesota Consitution prohibits the promotion of a particular religion which is what he says this prayer does.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Dibble with drivel!

  • @Mahoivlich - You have quite the fast and loose definition of "church," my friend. Giving a prayer before a legislative session does not a church make.

  • Thank You, Jesus, for Senator Dan Hall! This country needs more leaders like him.

  • My favorite part of Article 1, Section 16 of MN Constitution is "the right of every man to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience shall never be infringed."

  • Sen. Dibble is a clergy bully! In actuality, he is attacking all religions and all spiritual leaders. His spiritual prejudice goes beyond Christianity. He uses section 16 inappropriately. Dibble’s interpretation is so disingenuous that he owes Senator Hall and the Minnesota Senate a public apology.

  • “By George, I think you've got it!” This is Senator Hall's whole idea here. We must stop men like Senator Dibble from trampling on our constitutional rights. Of course a Muslim senator is free to pray to Allah. And that freedom is also extended to a prayer from a senator who is a follower of Rev Sun Myung Moon. Sen. Dibble and people like him try to intimidate and bully the clergy of all religions by both quoting and interpreting our constitution to eliminate God based upon their preference.

  • How ironic that the re-reading of the first historical prayer read in Congress is needed to be censured by those who now perceive it as un-Constitutional and bigoted. Perhaps a little more reading of original documents from American history would do us all good.

  • I don't really have a problem with this prayer as long as those of other faiths are able to share their perspectives as well. I wonder, though, how those supporting Mr. Hall would respond if a practicing Muslim senator read a prayer to Allah.

  • Liking Dan Hall not the objection

  • The United States Constitution Trumps your State Constitution

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more