Petroglyphs Native American Artifacts Arrowhead Hunting
Uploader Comments (rockwithface)
All Comments (19)
-
awesome
-
I HAVE A FEW STONES WITH MAY FACES IN THEM.....LIKE TO SHARE THEM WITH U.....
-
definately not man made, if a prehistoric man was to have made that he most likely would have made it more purportionate being that it would take a great deal of effort to make such an artifact. The "eyes" are completly different in size, I would say its nature made
-
awesome!
-
that is good info. I have a couple of the tiny "dolls' that were created under/for the same circumstances. I knew they were worked but didn't have a clue...thought they might be game pieces haha. Just triangular bottom with rounded top, per the folks that do more than dabble in this field the tradition of presenting a carved doll at birth goes way back to paleo.
-
In order to meet pre-requisite to qualify as a stone tool a piece must reflect four or more percussion blows indicative of systematic pecking or flaking. Four was derived as the magic number that should be unachievable by natural events. I don't know how that would a apply to a multi holed paint pot that looks like a face.
-
Honestly, I disagree that it's an artifact. Take it to a specialist to have it authenticated (not just having a ranger look at it and give an opinion, actual documentation), but I'd say it's a geofact.
-
its the face of a newborn baby some tribes would make these for their children on the day of birth kinda like a newborns first pic in the modern days
-
Man, that is sweet!!!! You can see the "human influence" or "precussion" marking in the eyes, it is a no brainer, nice human head effigy! Thanks for sharing that with all of us, dont get to see artifacts of that magnitude very often.
I had this face rock at the Missouri State Park at the Mastodon Center and they told
me that it is an artifact. Thank You
rockwithface 11 months ago