Petroglyphs Native American Artifacts Arrowhead Hunting

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,291
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 20, 2009

Rock found in Jefferson County Missouri, 1998. I always look for arrowheads by the creeks and found this . I seen stone axes, spears, arrowheads, pottery, stone bowls, tools, but never a face rock. Also I collect geodes, minerals, fossils, And US coins.
my email is pauldashe@yahoo.com

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (rockwithface)

  • I had this face rock at the Missouri State Park at the Mastodon Center and they told

    me that it is an artifact. Thank You

see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • awesome

  • I HAVE A FEW STONES WITH MAY FACES IN THEM.....LIKE TO SHARE THEM WITH U.....

  • definately not man made, if a prehistoric man was to have made that he most likely would have made it more purportionate being that it would take a great deal of effort to make such an artifact. The "eyes" are completly different in size, I would say its nature made

  • awesome!

  • @princewes

    that is good info. I have a couple of the tiny "dolls' that were created under/for the same circumstances. I knew they were worked but didn't have a clue...thought they might be game pieces haha. Just triangular bottom with rounded top, per the folks that do more than dabble in this field the tradition of presenting a carved doll at birth goes way back to paleo.

  • In order to meet pre-requisite to qualify as a stone tool a piece must reflect four or more percussion blows indicative of systematic pecking or flaking. Four was derived as the magic number that should be unachievable by natural events. I don't know how that would a apply to a multi holed paint pot that looks like a face.

  • Honestly, I disagree that it's an artifact. Take it to a specialist to have it authenticated (not just having a ranger look at it and give an opinion, actual documentation), but I'd say it's a geofact.

  • its the face of a newborn baby some tribes would make these for their children on the day of birth kinda like a newborns first pic in the modern days

  • Man, that is sweet!!!! You can see the "human influence" or "precussion" marking in the eyes, it is a no brainer, nice human head effigy! Thanks for sharing that with all of us, dont get to see artifacts of that magnitude very often.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more