In Defense of WWII: Part 5 of 5

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,239
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 1, 2008

Buchanan describes the emergence of a "Churchill cult" in America post-9/11, whereby the liberation of Iraq from Saddam was erroneously equated with the liberation of Europe from Hitler. Hanson and Hitchens contend that this diagram is, in fact, correct.

I apologize for the volume of the video.

It's still perfectly viewable, just be warned that it is louder than the other four parts.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (AngrySkeptic)

  • That line about Lincoln freeing the slaves is bollocks. He only freed them in the rebel south. Not in the north. As his Sec of State, whose name escapes me pointed out: He freed them where he couldn't free them and didn't where he could.

  • @wanker4761

    You couldn't be any more wrong.

    Lincoln was concerned that the Emancipation Proclamation would be seen as a temporary war measure and so actively campaigned for the 13th amendment. It was passed by both the House and Senate before his assassination.

    Stop reading neo-confederate piffle.

  • @AngrySkeptic I've read it in too many well footnoted books and heard it in several lectures from lettered people to believe you over them. More importantly, what's a "piffle"?

  • @wanker4761

    Piffle is an English word meaning nonsense.

    Go look at the ratification history of the 13th amendment, what I posted is a simple historical fact.

  • @AngrySkeptic Let's see now. When were the slaves freed? That would be when the 13th Amendment was ratified right? That was Dec 6, '65. Lincoln was shot in April '65. So he never freed a single slave except where he couldn't free them. More importantly, he effectively ended the right of secession which ruined the country. And ignored habeas corpus by illegally imprisoning thousands of Northerners. Suggest you lose the Church of Lincoln piffle. Good word, I must use it more often.

  • @wanker4761

    The 13th amendment was passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864 and passed by the House on January 31, 1865, and adopted on December 6, 1865.

    You are Canadian, so I understand you don't have a full grounding in the Constitutional Amendment process. Lincoln and the Radical Republicans were aware that the Emancipation Proclamation would have to be followed by an amendment. Which it was and that amendment was passed out of the Congress before Lincoln's assassination.

  • @wanker4761

    A number of seceded states were already under federal occupation and slaves there were freed.

    As for Habeas Corpus, it may be suspended in areas under active rebellion by an act of congress.Article I, Section 9 of the US constitution: "The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

Top Comments

  • This video has two of the best indicators of quality:

    A 5-star rating.

    Comments written in proper English, without personal attacks.

    Thanks for posting!

  • I've enjoyed watching this discussion. Thanks for posting!

see all

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Its a great relief to me to come across this kind of inquiry and discussion, as I feel so surrounded by liberal intentions at the University level of indoctrination and revisionism. I have had professors unabashedly promote ideas such as those in Buchanan's book, and those who want America destroyed from within. I don't speak from conspiracy theory opinions, I have literally had debates with these professors who are obsessed with the blame and shame America campaign, and I fear for America.

  • This program is nonsense with a hidden agenda. The U.S. did not enter World War II to do good. The world does not work that way. America entered the war because the elite felt its interests threatened and after the country was attacked, not before. In Iraq, U.S. imperialism supported Saddam until it felt him a threat to its interests in that oil-rich part of the world.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more