Discrimination

New No on Prop 8 Ad Calls Upon Californians to Reject Discrimination. Narrated by Samuel Jackson.


Support the No On Prop 8 campaign by rating, commenting on, favoriting, and sharing this video with your friends. Find out more at http://noonprop8.com/ and on our Facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/pages/No-on-Prop-8-Dont-Eliminate-Marriage-for-Anyone...
Or on Twitter at http://twitter.com/noonprop8

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• yes
• discrimination
• proposition
• prop
• california
• ca
• commercial
• gay
• lesbian
• marriage
• equality
• noonprop8
• prop8
• same
• sex
• constitution
• elect
• Samuel
• Jackson

[mcnuggetssmcnuggetss]

If doing a narration for a stance makes one gay then what does viewing this video make you?

[DoctorWeeTodd]

@TeenParodyInc and you shouldn't be making comments. You are not an expert on these matters.

[cheezpleaze105]

Equal rights!!!

[Eterna1snow]

Samuel Jackson voiced it, therefore No on 8 is correct.

[CrunchBogus]

They had Samuel L. Jackson on their side, and they still didn't win. I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

[DoctorWeeTodd]

People who are against civil rights:

Watch out, Samuel L. Jackson shall "strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger."

[mermaidsareppl222]

@andrewiscool100able prop h8 denies equal rights to all

so it is unfair and very wrong

[TheJadedblack]

It's a constitutional amendment to separate church from state. Basically meaning that if a church does not want to marry gay couples then they don't have to. Because if they are forced to then are we really separating church from state or are we using excuses for churches to go against what they preach. I don't care either way for gay couples to marry, just don't force churches to do things they are against. There have been plenty churches opposed to interracial couples marrying.

[payasoinfeliz]

im not sure if churchs can be forced to do that, even interracial couples. after all, many will not allow female priests, or male nuns, for example. sexism is pretty common in the churches, and as far as i know, is not challenged by any state laws.

[KIDSunglass]

@andrewiscool100able If churches do not follow state law by allowing same sex couples to marry, then yes they should loose their tax exeptions. What if a church didnt want to marry an interracial couple? Is a church wrong then? It sounds like the same thing to me. Yes you can have your opinions whether same-sex marriage is right or wrong, but if your a state regulated church, then you need to follow state law, no matter what your beliefs are.

[Cajaquarius]

@TeenParodyInc Like it or not, celebrities are the demagogues and high priests of the new generation. More Americans voted for American Idol than their own Senators on average so to say that an enterprising political party shouldn't use them is ridiculous. The charisma and power a celebrity holds is a powerful tool in getting a point across and convincing people. Sadly most Americans wouldn't even recognize even a Supreme Court judge if one was shown.