Top Comments
All Comments (66)
-
Sinatra is from the old days when the music industry was more specialized. Singers sang songs, songwriters wrote songs, musicians played songs that songwriters wrote. By the 1960s it was becoming more common for musicians to write, sing and play their own songs. So please don't judge Frank by standards that came along late in his career. He was singer and he was one of the best ever. No one could swing or phrase like him. But he wasn't a songwriter, that's not the era he came from.
-
The Beatles' members (not Ringo obviously) were clearly far far better musicians and more innovative, but Sinatra's presence puts him level.
-
As far as a singer and performer, Sinatra is the King.
-
@CoIeStones They are both very very good,.but you can not compare them.
-
@CoIeStones Ok, I don't want to argue with a Beatles fan, the possibility that Sinatra was a best singer. I only say that your point was weak, because with that argument you can say even that Daddy Yanky is better than The Beatles, Sinatra, Ray Charles, Jerry Lee Lewis, Beethoven, Chuck Berry or Chaikowsky. Your new point is better, congrats
-
@Acoyte1994 The Beatles are better than Frank Sinatra, I can sing to, but The Beatles made their own songs, made a revolution in music. All Frank Sinatra does is sing other peoples songs, and they all sound the same. Its gets boring, but The Beatles have alot of variety. Im not trying to say Frank Sinatra is bad, hes a very good singer, but hes definately not the best.
-
Sinatra was not much like a beatles's fan, but he loved this song. It is a good cover.
-
@CoIeStones Yeah! and Bieber too... Meaning?
-
seriously, can I "like" this again?
-
I LOVE THIS!!!!!
Sinatra called "Something" the greatest love song of the 20th Century.
rbhumes 1 year ago 37
nobody is bigger than sinatra!!
ipv13 1 year ago 24