Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Perez Hilton On MSNBC: Her Answer Lost The Crown & I Retract My Apology!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
14,999
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 20, 2009

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 126 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Omg, she was asked what she BELIEVED! Perez Hilton, shut up. Seriously she doesn't have to agree with you being gay. She didn't say it bothered her she just said what she thought! Ughh, i hate Perez Hilton.

  • How she answered the question? You mean truthfully rather than some fucking prewritten answer given to her to vomit up to you? Yeah, fuck you Perez.

see all

All Comments (612)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Dear reporter, 0:53 , you can choose same sex marriage. Go get married in one of those 4 states. Get over it.

  • Everybody needs to calm down cause Perez isnt angry that shes against gay marriage, HE SAYS IT IN THE VIDEO, but thats not what is upsetting about it. She should have answered it with more class in that she did not have to make her answer so black and white. But thats just my opinion

  • Perez Hilton should really back off he asked for her opinion and she gave it.

  • IT WAS HER OPINION!!!!! ... SHE STOOD UP FOR GOD AND HER FAITH.

  • SHE HAS MORALS YOU FUCKING FAG.YOUR JUST PISSED CAUSE SHE GETS MORE DICK THEN YOU ,,

  • he would have responded thexsame to anyone of her disagreeing answer right or wrong and she has the right to an opinion and should be aloud do feel like a winner without him mocking her every word

  • Wow -- our weird looking Perez Hilton loud-mouth pscho-babble media ho(st). Landed here by happenstance (pretty gals); just viewed the segment that he rants about. FACT: gal was loudly cheered on by her audience, fittingly. Her polite response merely focused upon that fundamental driver in any so-called elective political system: she rapidly zeroed in on what would sway voter direction .... in any state, citing her own criteria as exemplar. She avoided any didactic states rights gig

  • … his lunatic rant is intentionally injurious: a vindictive blast that might seem plausible but it does not hold up under logic evaluation. Factors: Contestants must a) aptly respond to any question, no matter how inane or inappropriate (or agenda vested), and bring it around, via a rapid-fire response (seconds literally tick), which b) bridges the void between generalization and particular application: her response, almost elegantly, does that: see below

  • WAIT WAIT WAIT..aren't gay men supposed to be really attractive?

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more