Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

3 of 3: The Bizarre Hilarious Disturbing Marvelous Things I Learned When I Read the Bible

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,938
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 7, 2009

A review of David Plotz's "Good Book: The Bizarre, Hilarious, Disturbing, Marvelous, and Inspiring Things I Learned When I Read Every Single Word of the Bible" - http://www.amazon.com/Good-Book-Hilarious-Disturbing-Marvelous/dp/0061374245/...

Review by Todd Allen Gates, author of "Dialogue with a Christian Proselytizer."

My four YouTube channels:

- http://youtube.com/user/ToddGates - my musician channel

- http://youtube.com/user/ToddAllenGates - where I discuss the ideas in "Dialogue with a Christian Proselytizer"

- http://youtube.com/user/ToddAllenGates2 - where I discuss the ideas in my book "Hunting, Gathering, & Videogames" (such as "Why do we have to work?" and "Why do we have to use money?" and "How should we define 'success'?")

- http://youtube.com/user/BlasphemyPiano - where I play the background piano accompaniment for songs in Nick Gisburne's book of lyrics "Blasphemy! Anthems for Atheists."

For customer reviews of "Dialogue with a Christian Proselytizer": http://www.amazon.com/Dialogue-Christian-Proselytizer-Allen-Gates/dp/16014508...

Link to eBook: http://booklocker.com/books/2739.html

Link to free PDF excerpt: http://assets.booklocker.com/pdfs/2739s.pdf

For customer reviews of "Hunting, Gathering, & Videogames": http://www.amazon.com/Hunting-Gathering-Videogames-Allen-Gates/dp/1601450443/...

Link to eBook: http://booklocker.com/books/2672.html

Link to free PDF excerpt: http://assets.booklocker.com/pdfs/2672s.pdf

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • enjoyable videos my good Sir.All 5stared.

  • Same here.

see all

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 4 of 4: "Faith" may be a good enough reason for the believer, but it's a useless argument to base proselytizing on, because "faith" is a flexible enough reason to support EVERY religion: from Christianity to Islam to Hinduism to Mormonism to Scientology (etc.)

  • 3 of 4:

    My videos are more for those who are already unbelievers, but are having trouble responding to Christian proselytizers who tell them they need to accept Christ or spend eternity in hellfire. That's an extraordinary claim--and one that should be heeded if true--but what reason is there that we should accept the idea that the Bible--or any other ancient scripture--has Divine Authority?

  • 2 of 4:

    > It's Faith, why try to accuse people for their Faith?

    Believe it or not, I actually agree with you when it comes to people whose faith is a source of comfort or strength to them, and don't try to convert others. When I'm around such people (like 95% of my neighbors and co-workers), I keep my big mouth shut.

    But my videos are not aimed at picking on theists who are minding their own business.

  • @TOSViolator

    1 of 4:

    > Maybe it's because there have been many, many large floods on Earth?

    Could be! (Also, when people experienced floods in ancient times, people may have assumed the floods were worldwide rather than local.)

    > I honestly don't even want to argue.

    Okay, understood.

  • @ToddAllenGates

    Maybe it's because there have been many, many large floods on Earth? I honestly don't even want to argue. It's Faith, why try to accuse people for their Faith?

  • 3 of 3:

    But if I'm ignoring some important legitimate and objective source that tells us the Flood is historical fact, please let me know. I don't mind admitting it when I'm wrong.

    A decent debunking of the Flood myth (if you're interested) is on potholer54's channel, called "Noah's Flood debunked - 1": youtubeDOTcom/watch?v=e5ElhX38­w3Q.

    (I find potholer54's science to be quit solid, although I confess he uses a bit too much sarcasm for my tastes).

  • 2 of 3:

    ... and interpret whatever evidence they find in a way that supports that conclusion.

    Real science, on the other hand, looks at the evidence, and lets the evidence itself dictate the conclusion. And no non-religious scientist / historian accepts the story as literal. Even many Christian scientists & historians acknowledge this, and interpret the whole story as symbolic only.

  • @TOSViolator

    1 of 3:

    > They do have evidence for The Flood, actually.

    If there really was a flood, it seems to me that mainstream scientists and historians would acknowledge it (even if they didn't attribute the flood to an angry god). But as far as I know, the only people who claim there's physical evidence of the Flood are those who also feel the Bible is the Word of God, and thus *need* the story to be true. Accordingly, they KNOW what their conclusion is ...

  • They do have evidence for The Flood, actually. Whatever though.

  • @drfoxcourt

    > I appreciate the analysis and critique.

    Thank you!

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more