His key words are "extraterrestrial presence" if no extraterrestrial existence. I think that he may be aware that aliens have not only visited earth, but have an old base on the month and were in fact under the Archuletta Mesa as Paul Bennewitz discovered, the only man to actually find an alien base, the story got deeper as he learned actual black military figures were working with the aliens. There has been a lot of disinformation on the net to make this discovery easy to be dismissed.
@paymentseal I've studied the clips closely and there is no question years ago when questioned about the incident Aldrin thought the object that was trailing them was a UFO...his story has changed over the years and now it was a part of the spacecraft...panel they blew off or something. He was told no doubt to cool it....and unlike Mitchell and Cooper he could be bought or just decided not to pursue it.
I just got intrigued by the UFO topic/footages this week. Searched NASA's site about UFO and found an article stating that Aldrin's statements were taken "out of context". After viewing many clips of Aldrin's statements, I just can't help but wonder what is NASA talking about?
I am late to this string, but see the most common issue on these types of videos. That issue is skeptics vs. religion vs. scientific approaches. Setting the skeptics aside for this video (hard to argue with an astronaut stating what he believes), I think the religious and scientific approaches are saying the same thing, i.e., there are things out there that are not ours, top secret, and/or alien. Calling them demons, archangels, E.T.'s, or spacemen, is merely a point of view/belief.
@mcmchugh99 Some of you? Thanx for the generalization. I'll accept your certainty as your opinion. Course that opinion comes only from the non-religious type right? Yah, you heard me, I know who you are and what you're about after reading a few sentences you wrote...I suppose I might need to be obvious and let you know that I'm being sarcastic.
@finalmattasy There' are always some of you on these threads trying to bring religion into the discussion, when it's really a scientific question. I believe based on the evidence that we are being visited by a variety of ET civilizations, although I'm not at all sure about these stories about contactees, abductions and so on. I'm not sure they even want to have much contact with us, although they are obviously looking around. It has nothing to do with any kind of religion, though.
i agree...these astronauts are reputable and have no interest in covering up...
MrGraydalbion 4 months ago
flashes? Micro-meteorites? (may have the name wrong but that sort of thing hahaha
spoorsmeister 4 months ago
The best proof of anyone is and Astronaut !
onetrashdancer 10 months ago
shame its so bad quality.....
klutzsm58 1 year ago
His key words are "extraterrestrial presence" if no extraterrestrial existence. I think that he may be aware that aliens have not only visited earth, but have an old base on the month and were in fact under the Archuletta Mesa as Paul Bennewitz discovered, the only man to actually find an alien base, the story got deeper as he learned actual black military figures were working with the aliens. There has been a lot of disinformation on the net to make this discovery easy to be dismissed.
KevinPaul444 1 year ago
@paymentseal I've studied the clips closely and there is no question years ago when questioned about the incident Aldrin thought the object that was trailing them was a UFO...his story has changed over the years and now it was a part of the spacecraft...panel they blew off or something. He was told no doubt to cool it....and unlike Mitchell and Cooper he could be bought or just decided not to pursue it.
agostomi 1 year ago
I just got intrigued by the UFO topic/footages this week. Searched NASA's site about UFO and found an article stating that Aldrin's statements were taken "out of context". After viewing many clips of Aldrin's statements, I just can't help but wonder what is NASA talking about?
paymentseal 1 year ago
I am late to this string, but see the most common issue on these types of videos. That issue is skeptics vs. religion vs. scientific approaches. Setting the skeptics aside for this video (hard to argue with an astronaut stating what he believes), I think the religious and scientific approaches are saying the same thing, i.e., there are things out there that are not ours, top secret, and/or alien. Calling them demons, archangels, E.T.'s, or spacemen, is merely a point of view/belief.
netwaggie 1 year ago
@mcmchugh99 Some of you? Thanx for the generalization. I'll accept your certainty as your opinion. Course that opinion comes only from the non-religious type right? Yah, you heard me, I know who you are and what you're about after reading a few sentences you wrote...I suppose I might need to be obvious and let you know that I'm being sarcastic.
finalmattasy 1 year ago
@finalmattasy There' are always some of you on these threads trying to bring religion into the discussion, when it's really a scientific question. I believe based on the evidence that we are being visited by a variety of ET civilizations, although I'm not at all sure about these stories about contactees, abductions and so on. I'm not sure they even want to have much contact with us, although they are obviously looking around. It has nothing to do with any kind of religion, though.
mcmchugh99 1 year ago