Moon Myths: Hoax theories analysed

Why is the flag flying in the wind? Where are the stars? We put the lunar landing conspiracy theories under the spotlight with former government UFO i. Follow us on twitter at http://twitter.com/itn_news

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• hoax
• myth
• moon
• landings
• fake
• neil
• armstrong
• buzz
• aldrin

[Mozart1220]

I gave you the location of all your answers, You refuse to even read it. You are a loonie. Go back to your Cocoa Puffs and tin foil hat in your Mommy's basement. 

[hunchbacked]

@Mozart1220

I made up nothing; I just see what exists in the project.

And you'll know one day that the "loonie" was right.

[Mozart1220]

@hunchbacked Yeah, stuff you made up . You are a loonie.

[hunchbacked]

@Mozart1220

Certainly not, for Clavius is not aware of many problems with Apollo.

My personal site is crammed full with problems that Clavius has never talked about.

[Mozart1220]

@hunchbacked It explains and disproves every batshit theory you and your ilk have. I can see how you would want to disregard it.

[Mozart1220]

@hunchbacked In other words, you avoid reading facts because they contradict and disprove your batshit conspiracy.

[hunchbacked]

@Mozart1220

Sorry, but I don't read propaganda.

[hunchbacked]

@Mozart1220

I know this site, and it explains very little in regard of all that has to be explained.

It just shows how little you know the problems of APollo, and the great quantity of incoherences, not only in the footage, but also in the technology.

[Mozart1220]

@hunchbacked No they don'y, but they are considerably less intense out side of them. You might want to read up on WHAT KIND of "radiation" you are talking about and the INTENSITY of it. Oh wait, you would disregard all those facts and go with some timn foil hat nutjob. Got it.

[Mozart1220]

@hunchbacked It's an entire wbsite dedicated to explaining in detail why people like you are wrong. But I knew you would disregard it. You obviously didn't read everything, you didn't have time. So go back to your old man in the desert with a leaf blower. I'll stick with scientists and others who have actual, well..you know...FACTS.

[hunchbacked]

@Mozart1220

Clavius.org is a joke; they answer very few questions.

You are absolutely not aware of all the problems with Apollo.

[hunchbacked]

@Mozart1220

The radiations do not stop after the Van Allen belts, much to the contrary!

[hunchbacked]

@Mozart1220

It has not been faked convincingly since I am a moon hoaxer.

In fact they could have faked it more convincingly, but they refused to do it because they had more morals than those who forced them to fake it. 

[Mozart1220]

@hunchbacked First off, your quaestion is flawed. it SHOUD be, "Why NOT go to the moon if you know it's possible to do so and there is no reason to fake it?" It could not have been faked convincingly then, and it was completely within our technology to actually go. The Van Allen Belts do not have as much DANGEROUS radiation as you have been led to believe. Again I refer you to Clavius.org. Eeveryquestion you have and more are answered there. Of course, you won't accept them, but I tried.

[hunchbacked]

@Mozart1220

And why go to the moon if it can be faked and (almost) everybody believes in it?

[Mozart1220]

@hunchbacked Why go back to the Moon? There is no real reason.

[hunchbacked]

@Mozart1220

Believe me, we won't go to Mars before a long long while.

We should first go to the moon...for real!

[hunchbacked]

@Mozart1220

Apollo 13 was just a comedy to bring a little suspense, to awake the interest for the missions.

If this had really happened in the real reality, the astronauts would not have come back alive.



[hunchbacked]

@Mozart1220

Do you know that Kennedy, two years after having made his warm speech about going to the moon, realized that it was not that easy and was speaking about collaborating with the Russians for this project, because wanting it "bad enough" would not be enough; but the CIA didn't want to hear about it, because it had its own project, and if Kennedy was threatening to change it....you see what I mean!

[hunchbacked]

@Mozart1220

OK, if you want bad enough to jump from the empire state building or from the top of the Eiffel tower, you think that you'll manage it?

One day, someone wanted "bad enough" to be able to fly with wings and jumped from the Eiffel tower with his "wings".

But wanting it "bad enough" didn't help him much; he fell like a stone and could not relate his feelings afterwards.

Wanting something "bad enough" is not always enough to succeed; you also need the possibility of doing it..

[Mozart1220]

@un4g1v3n1 They did not do it "flawlessly". Applo 13 anyone? And all the deaths involving the Shuttle can be attributed to budget cuts.

[Mozart1220]

@un4g1v3n1 There was no backwards leap in technology, just in desire to go. It is incredibly expensive to get anything to and from the Moon. To go to Mars we need to learn how to deal with the long term effects of low or no gravitty, and much of what goes on in the ISS is in that direction.

[Mozart1220]

@hunchbacked It's not impossible, is what I'm saying, and just because it's difficult does not mean they didn't do it. What I was saying is that we humans can do pretty much anything we want to, all we have to do is want to bad enough.

[hunchbacked]

@un4g1v3n1

Yes, it is deadly.

And landing on the moon is also very difficult and impossible to simulate on earth; they should have had to make tests directly on the moon, land not inhabited lunar modules on the moon till they succeeded, but it would have taken time and cost a lot of money; so, since it had the same effect on people if it was faked, they preferred the solution of faking it (and I am sure that a good part of the tax money went to the costly vietnam war).

[MonteBlood1996]

@un4g1v3n1 i didn't say shit about money why the you replying to me?