I have to agree with Masere: Since most of you use EVERY character form both ST & SW, the 'Q', the Doud(destroyed all the Hoosnock race everywhere with a thought), the Metrons & various other nearly omnipotant races, could eradicate those with the power of the Force with but a thought. If you honest, you'll agree.
I absolutely can't stand all this SW is better than ST shit. What about Battlestar Galactica? Firefly?
I like all these, although I still think SW in itself is like a cheat... there's absolutely nothing about in its own universe that it compares against the one we live in. At least Star Trek went to the effort of at least making realistic figures in its technology, whereas Star Wars uses hypermatter and ion power!
I know no one knows the real qualities of star trek, it's not a war story. But- as you can see while vader is doing his usual shit, the borg assimilated him three times, while star destroyers try to damage voyager shields one per cent, they were destroyed by phasers, transphases torpedos. While a lightsaber( that couldn't logical exist because of the basic physics), a phaser won thosand times before. Ok nothing against star wars, but it's unrealistic, a baby go to bed story
@comicbookfan19 Actually the Borg have a finite number of ships, and a single Star Destroyer has the firepower to obliterate entire fleets of cubes on it's own without difficulty.
@Perion Star Trek wins, for very many reasons: in and out of Canon
Idazmi7 2 months ago
SW has got special effect . Star trek Has got soul and technology
RPD49 2 months ago
by definition DV is a borg
catman621 8 months ago
I have to agree with Masere: Since most of you use EVERY character form both ST & SW, the 'Q', the Doud(destroyed all the Hoosnock race everywhere with a thought), the Metrons & various other nearly omnipotant races, could eradicate those with the power of the Force with but a thought. If you honest, you'll agree.
Velocity9s 10 months ago
I absolutely can't stand all this SW is better than ST shit. What about Battlestar Galactica? Firefly?
I like all these, although I still think SW in itself is like a cheat... there's absolutely nothing about in its own universe that it compares against the one we live in. At least Star Trek went to the effort of at least making realistic figures in its technology, whereas Star Wars uses hypermatter and ion power!
BattleshipAgincourt 11 months ago
Star trek for ever.
I know no one knows the real qualities of star trek, it's not a war story. But- as you can see while vader is doing his usual shit, the borg assimilated him three times, while star destroyers try to damage voyager shields one per cent, they were destroyed by phasers, transphases torpedos. While a lightsaber( that couldn't logical exist because of the basic physics), a phaser won thosand times before. Ok nothing against star wars, but it's unrealistic, a baby go to bed story
tzasas1 11 months ago
@comicbookfan19 Actually the Borg have a finite number of ships, and a single Star Destroyer has the firepower to obliterate entire fleets of cubes on it's own without difficulty.
Perion 11 months ago
@ISSFIPhoenix Star Trek loses (fixed again)
Perion 11 months ago
Star Trek wins
ISSFIPhoenix 1 year ago
startrek wins vader is a badass but the borg would keep coming he would never be able to out last them.
comicbookfan19 1 year ago