Wisconsin Supreme Court Says Anti-Union Law Can Go Into Effect

June 14, 2011 MSNBC
http://MOXNews.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Wisconsin
• Supreme
• Court
• Says
• Anti-Union
• Law
• rule
• ruling
• Can
• Go
• Into
• Effect

[godthisisannoying]

First we export jobs to China, now we import employment conditions from China. Full circle. When's the recall scheduled to take place?

[howedesign]

@mssedmebich The ban is on free TOYS in low nutrition meals (not on the meals and not just Happy Meals). The parents aren't doing their job and we have an epidemic of childhood obesity. The loony circumcision ban is only on the ballot for next November put there by 7,700 zealots (not "Brown Shirts" nor jewish :-) and has no chance of passing. The only peanut ban I know was for one day in 1950, banned from baseball by Paul Fagan, millionaire owner of the San Francisco Seals baseball team.

[mssedmebich]

@howedesign And I work for the public schools and know what I'm talking about.

[howedesign]

@mssedmebich My purpose was to inform you about your mistaken notions. I'm not interested in your defensiveness or your bait-and-switch arguments.

[mssedmebich]

@howedesign Where in the constitution did we ever grant anybody the authority to decide if my child gets a toy with his meal. Try sending your child to public school with a Peanut butter sandwich. People like you who think parents like me are not doing our job scare me more than any rich ass republican.

[mssedmebich]

@howedesign Dude. the far left in San Fransico has outlawed among many other things; Happy meals, Circusission, Peanuts or peanut products in public area's. Theirs no shortage of life controlling brown shirts on the left.

[mssedmebich]

@exacerbatedtaboo Only if it has federal involvement. Bush and Gore were able to take the decision of the Florida supreme court to the supreme court because their were obvious connections at the Fed level. This law does not effect federal workers in Wisconsin. It limits only the state workers. It's not a civil rights case because their is no Constitutional Right to collective bargaining. Some state workers enjoy more bargaining rights then federal workers.

[exacerbatedtaboo]

@biggerturtle Does that mean you don't have an answer either? Cause it seems to me that if you had an answer you'd provide it instead of just insulting ME. You insult has nothing to do with the question. It's o.k. if you don't know the answer either.

[exsinor]

@biggerturtle hahaha Walker wins hahahaha America loses hahahaha Are you going to be his next pool boy? hahahahaha