the Most Important Second ever. BigBang (National Geographic) mutadis1 upl.

http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback/the-3-laws-of-life---how-to-become-a-pe... Big Bang

IMPORTANT NOTE
Many years ago I took the Big Bang theory as the base for my theory 'the Big Bang of the Mind'.
About this video. Before the Big Bang there was nothing? I regard this as untrue! I suggest that laws of physics have no begin and no end. From nothing can occur only nothing! In the begin there was no matter, but there was something. Let us call it any form of 'energy'.
In these mind sets we flirt with the multiple dimensions ideas, a free port for mathematicians.
As Einstein's relativity theory already did in the past, it leads to uncontrolled fantasies. Be aware that these are but fantasies of the human mind, unless anything can become physically proven.
M Mutadis

PS
The statement: "laws of physics have no begin and no end", sounds like a dogma, and might be inaccurate. Maybe these laws were created during the big bang, and before and after (meaning at the end of our universe's existence ) other rules were (will) act. So multiple dimensions are never far away in these mindsets! Also notice, that not any person in this world knows what the elements matter, forces and energy are. Only the relation between them, the consequences can be understand under the qualification of the laws of physics.
****
The Mutadis's'Simplified Cosmos Cycle Principle'
Hubble discovered that the universe is continuously expanding.The expansion started from one point (BigBang), which is not yet located today.
Recent measurements indicate that the expanding components (stars, galaxies) accelerate. This is physically impossible, unless there is an attracting force (The dark matter/energy theories?). All universe's matter will finally reach the maximal velocity limit (speed of light), and will mutate at that point fe in a form of energy or maybe anti-matter? When all, or nearly all of the universe's matter become mutated, an unbalance in (dark?) energy/matter may occur, leading to a new BigBang cycle. If the initial conditions of a new BigBang deviate from the previous one, one could suggest that MAYBE the dosage between new matter, forces and energy become different, resulting in deviating physical laws (is only a wild guess, don't count on it!).
This is just a rough hypothetical idea of mine with not any guaranty of accuracy, and not any authority in the field. (Search your help by specialised scientists, but always be aware that some scientists as well as religious may confuse our minds. Remind that all people's thinking and acting is but the result of basic darwinistic motivators, no matter if one is an Einstein type or just a simple unlettered man.) MM

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• big
• bang
• first
• second
• mind
• mutadis
• theory
• creation
• matter
• energy
• forces
• evolution

[mutadis1]

NOTE: the base of the Big Bang theory (oerknal-Urknall) was discovered in 1931 by the Belgian Catholic priest and physician Georges Lemaitre (1894-1966). The observations of Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) gave physical evidence for the theory.

[mutadis1]

When we bump our head, it hurts! That is hard scientific reality.

Relating the BigBang with God(s) because we still don’t know everything, makes no sense. Gods and spirits are fantasies of the human mind, invented throughout history to compensate our fears and the lack of actual knowledge. MM (response to comments)

[mutadis1]

Building a chain of nuclear power plants (incl. MOX!!) in a high level risk earthquake area is the same as ‘Selling your Soul to the Devil to obtain earthly Riches’! However the courage of the Japanese how they deal with their apocalyptic ordeal deserves respect and full support.

[mutadis1]

EVOLUTION by M.Mutadis. (the darwinPlus rule 1991/ book:‘3 Laws of Life’, published online Sept 2008) Species evolve due to the mix of male and female genes into the progeny. Species evolve (slow mutation) into new species due to nature’s imperfection in reproducing exact complex genes molecule copies. Environment dictates which properties survive. (Darwin)

[mutadis1]

Relativity1/2 (simplified): Ride a car speed 70, throw forwards a ball out with speed 30. Ball flies total speed 100 relative to road or spectator. The car lights send light travelling at constant speed...... read it on channel's page, error mssge here...

[mutadis1]

Relativity2/2: Light, a form of energy. A body contains matter. Matter has mass. Energy is needed to accelerate mass. Towards light speed (c), mass increases. Accelerating a body close to c, would need a part of the energy of the universe! Most probably (full) matter cannot exist at light speed. CERN (Geneva); giant magnetic forces accelerate smallest particles to highest speeds in opposite direction, obtaining collisions; to learn about matter, energy, the universe and the BigBang. MM

[WilliamTyndale1]

Like a frozen turd in a hot bowl of chili, Lawrence Krauss is the epitome of brilliance! Thumbs up, if you "get it"

[jjclassjj]

love the video man

[willbirful]

Very enjoyable thank you

[shellybirdy]

love the video man

[ericajjful]

some really good stuff here

[Kritikoss1]

where can i find the original documanter

[bbokica1]

So what happend to the rest of this video?

[beyondcrowned]

@shookthees, I know right they claim scientists that don't believe in the big bang are crackpots YET quote on quote "from nowhere appears a fire ball of energy smaller than an atom." They say time, space, matter, nothing existed. That what they call "Nothing" would have to be something because something cannot come from nothing. In reality nothingness does not exist because everything is something. Even Einstein refused to believe that the REAL universe had a beginning or end.