Global warming proof
Uploader Comments (Jugheadr2)
Video Responses
All Comments (44)
-
@danetrain0101 Your right, forest fire in Alaska, all those trees burning in the middle of spring. With all the dry grass and fuel around to burn. It must be global warming. Because forest fires only happen South of the Canadian boarder. Global warming is so bad in the north pole its causing the curtains to fad. Its even getting in the water supply. In fact you can send me the money you will be paying the Rothschilds in carbon taxes.
-
Gee the north pole has a forest fire, where trees grow, so that is your proof of global warming. That it was summer and the snow has melted. Lots of dry grass around. I bet they don't have car crashes in the North Pole either. It was Alaska not the north pole, but I guess it makes your arguement sound better.
-
I'm convince! The hottness is incredible! Your right the cold is very warm errrr.... the warm is very cold I mean like you know . warmcold right? uh? yea.... praise be to Al.
-
We need to spread this news around to the masses!!! I'm so shocked that the conservative media is not showing this. The liberals where right all along. Praise Al Gore, our Lord and savior.
-
why would i say "specialized scientists researched"?
i'm bored with you now you just clearly don't understand how the earth and the atmosphere could possibly be connected so for that reason i'm going to ignore you.
-
the mention in 2008 refers soley to smog, something that exists very very VERY little in the atmosphere and is only in the bottom layer of the atmosphere.
look, all I'm trying to say is that "stop ripping on CO^2" but you seem incapable of saying anything (or anything intelligent) on the subject of CO^2. Everything else, fine! its real! but its not human induced CO^2!
Furthermore, you are probably gonna say something along the lines of "specialized scientists researched..." please see response
-
Quit changing the subject! again, second time now
you seem to be incapable of understanding! this is what I am testing for, the air's pollution! The point of this experiment is to show that CO^2 does not affect anything at all, furthermore the small volume accounts for the high concentration of CO^2 which in that area would be upwards of 24% of the atmosphere's weight, so many times the amount of CO^2. I have no idea where the earth had any affect! this is only to disprove CO^2 being the cause
-
second of all, not that it matters but many parts of the world have slightly different measurements of nitrogen, co2 and so forth. for example in the 2008 olympics beijing had to introduce new rules to cut back polution because the air was so full of polutants so "air is air" means nothing.
-
oh my god you are just coming up with more and more pathetic answers.
first of all taking a test in one square meter of air does not come up with the same results as measuring the tempersture of the atmosphere.
and in this magical fish tank of yours that can mimic the atmosphere where is the earth? without the earth what is the point of this test?
-
if i failed so bad, prove it, you've been avoiding the issue pulling in the effect of CO^2 and so on, the fact is; air is air, and its always the same. from shang hai to new york, the air is the same! how is a fishtank any different than a section of air? its not. air is air, all air is the same :
76% nitrogen
21% Oxygen
1%argon
and 2%other
and you can change O with CO^2, with that you can prove whether or not this has any effect
ok this isn't any sort of proof, I want to see solid proof that CO^2 causes Global warming. Here is a way: take 2 aquariums, and seal them, but before you do, put CO^2 in one by placing a burning candle in it and a thermometer in each. the candle will eat away at the O^2 and then we have CO^2. now put them in sunlight and one should warm up ALOT faster (because technichally, the amount of CO^2 in one is extreme)
PS: it doesn't
hanzie113 2 years ago
Do you deny that the 1965 Mustang was built in 1965?
Jugheadr2 2 years ago
Soaring carbon emissions are already causing ice-cap melting and threaten to trigger global flooding, widespread species loss and major disruptions of weather patterns in the near future.
Jugheadr2 3 years ago