another paul mccartney theory

Paul is Dead. Paul is NOT dead. Paul is Undead. Perhaps Paul McCartney died a little sooner than was previously thought, if he died at all. Which he did. But DID he? Yes? How can we be certain?

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• paul is dead
• Conspiracy
• Conspiracy Theory
• Paul McCartney
• Folklore
• Tiger Woods
• Sketchie

[beggarz]

Is Count Chocula dead too? WAAAAAAAHHH!!!!

[smackythefrog23]

@beggarz count cocula is dead undead undead undead.

[smackythefrog23]

@smackythefrog23 *chocula.

[welbyskinner]

If Paul McCartney was dead (which he isn't) Wikileaks would have published the supposed MI5 stuff by now!

[smackythefrog23]

@welbyskinner not if there were never in fact any documents. The whole crux of Paul Is Dead is that it was a cover up executed by the recording industry, and Parliament in general to avoid damage to their most profitable enterprise,

[catman63879]

you know they said that paul died in 1966. they said that after his death they replaced him and after he "died" they released the album rubber soul but if all the "paul is dead" believers did a little research they would discover that the album was released in 1965. how could this be?? paul isnt dead people wake up and get out of fantasy land!!

[smackythefrog23]

@catman63879 actually, there are clues that go back a LITTLE further than that. and if you notice, I state that he might have "died" earlier than 66. in fact, I think it was probably in 65, hence the point I make about there not being photographers allowed near any of their 1965 stages.

[sUop99]

@smackythefrog23 Actually, there's clues that date back all the way to Love Me Do. Of course, that's a stupid theory, considering that's their first official recording.

[beggarz]

@wmg1958

OMG!!! It's ALL TRUE!!!

[wmg1958]

@beggarz Yeah, but you're totally ignoring Boo-berry, which changes the whole trajectory of the argument. By the way, who are these "Beatles" of which you all speak and why are you ALL ignoring your spell checkers and misspelling "beetles?"

[wmg1958]

@beggarz Well, that makes perfect sense and beats out my theory that Elvis had not died but had plastic surgery and took over the role of Paul in 1978 after the cloned 1966 model Paul had a particularly nasty shaving accident while trimming his SGT Pepper era Mustache.

[StollandSon]

@beggarz To answer your question, the vocal chords as a child are smaller, thus making the pitch higher. When the voice changes in boys, it is usually around 10-12. The 13-14 years suck vocally. From 14-22, the voice starts to settle into it's range, but it will not fully settle until about age 25-30. Smoking does affect it, but not as much as one would think especially if one drinks enough water regularly. After 30, the changes are more due to overall health and energy. Hope that helps

[dylankaan2002]

nice!!

[beggarz]

@puakenikeni2011 Heather Mills is actually the original Paul - he had a sex change but MI5 wouldn't stand for it, so they cloned a new Paul from one of his (her) legs.

After two decades as a cripple crack whore, he proved John was right about his tawdry greed and narcissism by marrying his clone in a bizarre blackmail scheme - thus taking the rest of the band's advice to go and fuck himself.

Think crack started in the 80's? No way, MI5 developed it in the 40's - WAKE UP

[beggarz]

@smackythefrog23 Well, he's a smoker and a pothead... plus people's voices do change. I'm no expert ha ha but people do sound different when they are younger - is it possible to take that into account? For sake of an obvious example, could voice analysis connect a recording of a child to their voice as an adult? How much does one's voice change each decade as one ages? How does being a singer and/or smoker affect it?

[beggarz]

@smackythefrog23 Points I'd make are :

1) If one of The Beatles had died at that time, in the midst of this new phenomenon, it is not at all inconceivable that fears of mass suicides would compel something of this sort.

2) However, all this backtracking begs the question of HOW the guys came up with the phrases that would sound how they wanted in reverse?

3) Just because some of the 'proof' is bogus or stupid, doesn't necessarily mean this did or did not happen.

[beggarz]

@smackythefrog23 lmao cocula indeed ha ha ha - Well, that is a relief though, cuz not even MI5 has a surgeon who could make Frankenberry into the Count!

Then we'd be stuck with just berries and NO CHOCULA!!!