fossil record (refuting evolution)
Uploader Comments (Answerquestions1)
Video Responses
All Comments (62)
-
@Answerquestions1 Was finally an answer to this valid question..I don't see any or I'm missing something in the chain?
-
@evoTARDSareINSANE = non biologist
Got any more bogus proof that I have multiple accounts retard?
-
@buffboynick "Where do I say that on here?"
Well, I told you where to find it. Are you still denying it you gutless retard?
-
Most of the things you say don’t refute evolution at all. You just demonstrate that you don’t understand what you are reading. The things that would (ex: out of place fossils) come from questionable sources. You’re trying to refute good science (reviewed, tested, verified by multiple sources) with bad science (either not verified or debunked). Who would take this seriously?
-
@buffboynick "Actually I have researched the area and climate as to where the CHLCA and found hominids existed.
And guess what......
Finding fossils that are both YOUNGER and OLDER in that exact same area punches a HUGE hole in common ancestry.
Hominid fossils have been found all over the globe (including where Chimpanzees and other apes now live).
Rather odd we can find every fossil except a mythical species which spawned all the hominids and chimpanzees.
Use critical thinking."
Retard.
-
@buffboynick "Rather odd we can find every fossil except a mythical species which spawned all the hominids and chimpanzees." You are assuming that all other hominids that have existed left behind fossils, retard. Only a minority of species have the privilege to leave behind evidence of their existence. Is this the shite evoTARDSareINSANE taught you?
By the way; congratulations on being nominated for the next Claire's Dim Bulb of the Week award. Given the quality of your "research," you are currently the frontrunner.
WildwoodClaire1 1 year ago 7
@WildwoodClaire1
´´ By the way; congratulations on being nominated for the next Claire's Dim Bulb of the Week award. Given the quality of your "research," you are currently the´´
You are assuming that my reaserch was poor because acording to you any source that disagrees with you dogma (evolution) most be wrong.
the conclutions in my video are based on facts
Answerquestions1 1 year ago
@Answerquestions1 No, I assumed your "research" was poor because I am a geologist who easily recognized that your were a scientifically illiterate buffoon.
WildwoodClaire1 1 year ago 13
@WildwoodClaire1
If any of my so called facts is wrong, then I will be happy to know it, so please tell me, is there anything in my video that is not true? if that is the case I will be happy to post a video admiting my mistakes
Answerquestions1 1 year ago