Moon Rising: "False Horizons"

From the "False Horizons" sequences, this clip shows how the crosshairs have been removed from many of the sky backgrounds in the Apollo Photos, even cutting them in half. Whatever it was they were hiding, caused the crosshairs to be cut off entirely. http://moonrising-themovie.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• UFO
• The
• Greatest
• Story
• Ever
• Denied
• Moon
• NASA
• ufos

[doctorsizzle]

someone made a very interesting point about using telescopes. yes...don't you find it strange that if we had telescopes that can easily let us see the surface of the moon...then why the hell don't we have a shitload of pictures for the public to view. you've got millions of pictures of mount rushmore, grand canyon and other earthly wonders...why not photos of the surface of the moon...i mean the bitch is right there! look up and you see the moon. easy photos to get right? WRONG? AND WHY?

[Serubis]

Shows you the how low the government will go to keep people of earth Dumped down and stupid so they work like slaves and pay tax

[viewer821]

I have 3 questions:

1. 11 cameras were allegedly left on the moon. How was it possible to remove the film from the cameras with such glovers like the astronauts wore?

2.I recently that a modern (!) film fritz out at a temperature of -58°C . How can this old film survive temperature differences between -120°C and +120°C?

3. How can the film survive the strong radiation of the Van-Allen-Belt?

[rodgymac]

@StargodArbiter

Yup, we like to call this "The eSCAMilla Get-Out Clause". eSCAMilla likes to (inadvertently) use at least 2 logical fallicies per paragraph.

[andrefilms]

But why? What is there to hide?

[StargodArbiter]

So, let me get this straight...

You expect to see white crosshairs on a white background, and black ones on an equally black background?

...are you serious? Did you even think this one through?

[nightlightabcd]

Any amateur star gazer with enough money for the equipment, any telescope that can be adapted with atachments for a camera, and a camera can supply you with all the pictures you want. A good telescope can put you right into any crater. However, this is on the lighted side and thses craters are much larger than you might think so the resalution is not enough to detect the remnants of manned landings. There are many pictures of the surface of the moon and the universe if you look for them.

[doctorsizzle]

i mean without being a skeptic or believer...some of the analysis comes down to common sense. if we have telescopes that can catch the vivid colors of a nebula...farther than the moon or an anonymous photo of space with thousands of starts...where the hell did the colors and stars go in the picture of moon and earth...where all you see is BLACK!? i mean what happened to the stars behind the earth? not there? just earth, moon, and blank space?

[clnmyjts]

Just because it stamped a Nasa photo don`t give creed to it`s truth..Remember in the video moon Rising? He said the old guy that worked at nasa said they where lying about EVERYTHING.

This is a key point to make..What It really is saying to me is ( There is no truth YET..)

In this cause a picture is not as good as a thousand words..when you could have a million fake pictures. Faked by Nasa.

Like I said before ( take the toys away from Nasa and give them to someone honest..)

[clnmyjts]

IF...there was a real moon landing it wasn`t done with the space shuttles we think it was done with.

IF Nasa really did go to the moon and really did take all the photos presented by Nasa from & on the moon. Logics say`s it was done by a different form of space travel.

How black are black projects? How old are black space travel project?

IF we had advanced black space probes & crafts ( in 1960 ) then I would say the photo from the moon are real. IF not? Then it all a lie. EVERYTHING.

[DudeHolyCrap69]

so....what DOES it look like from space?