Re: "Throw me a Rock"

Another response to the sour comments of UTNow against the bible. Can't we use the bible as evidence for the origns of universe? That depends of the pressupposed ideas of the researher.The pressupose can be the fail of scientific method. And the funniest: The scientists knows that. What You pressupose? See Also "God exists? (REDUX)" and "God Exists part II" videos. See Ya.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• UTNow
• god
• bible
• science

[vulkanom]

Look, I dont know with who you're talking to, cause, I did'nt insulted anybody. In fact, if you know your language very well, you should know that I was insulted. Dont come here with this mediocre insult about language (I never lied about my limitations), at least I am able to communicate with people that dont speak my maternal language. Can you talk with me in portuguese?

[vulkanom]

Sure. But if you look in my videos you will see that I am not a Fundamentalist in Christianity as you are so in Atheism. For Example, I believe that the earth (it's material) is more then 6,000 years. It wa created before this time. Although I believe life had started in 6.000 years. That's why rocks are older than us.

[vulkanom]

One more thing "If you don't wanna believe, you will never believe". Wait, read that phrase again before go on.

Are you trying to find the equilibrium or trying to prove your point? If is the second statement then put your arguments and leave. Don't make me questions, doesn't matter what I say, it will give you only more reasons to dismiss others idea. Dont loose my time and yours.

[vulkanom]

Frankly I am sure that my argumment isn't the best, may even be the worst (what proves nothing). But my prejudice will never blind me like it do with you all. In the retoric field we can find argument to anything, what makes the difference is if I want to understand something and have a open dialogue/open mind or just prove my own,personal beliefs.

[ploopyism]

So, I believe that the universe was created by a mystical tie rack. This means that the possibility has just materialised out of my beliefs, and I have an equal chance of being correct to science and christianity. No.

Your theory is, quite frankly, the worst theory of science versus religion ever.

[vulkanom]

This is a FALACY. No great religion claims, stupidly like you described, a believe in something and period. All of them believe in som supernatural revelation that brought the bases of their believes. Bible, a prophet vision and etc...

[fullmetalpuma]

Terrible video. Faulty logic and terrible use of statistics. It doesn't appear you know much about the rules of argument.

[macropro]

the bible is a story book. it's a crock of shit!

[Orthologist]

Hell, Christianity is the best religion (regarding morality, not sarcasm). But let's apply your logic to other religions. 1/2 chance for God to exist right? So, let's give 1/2 to the Christian God, 1/2 to Allah and, say, 1/2 to all other Gods. Apply simple statistical rules, and the final probability of God to exist is not 1/2.

[MistarX]

The scientific method is used to prove facts. What it has not proven, will be. The bible is one of the greatest novels ever written. Full of "Mans" struggle with-in. Love stories, hate stories, epic battles, wife swapping, and even betrayal as a closer.

[DrRandola]

Do you really have a 50/50 chance of being right? I think not. It is not the same situation as a coin flip, where we know both possibilities exist. We do not know that both positions exist, but no god is the default. (In statistical parlance, it is the null hypothesis.)

[DrRandola]

Oh yeah, and the causal argument is not valid, either. There are a number of examples where it does not apply, such as the spontaneous formation of virtual particles, quantum tunneling, and various other quantum weirdness, do not require a cause.

[DrRandola]

Physical evidence makes random chance obsolete. Since the physical evidence points to life beginning about 3.5 b years ago, the fossil record, molecular gentics and cladistics demonstrate the evolutionary chain in full accord with each other, the chance of the babble being correct about creation is 0.

[DrRandola]

And fossils within those rocks which are older than us? Sorry dude, but the physical evidence says otherwise by a long ways.

[scraz51]

ROFL. Learn to speak the language before you try to insult someone in it. You need a treadmill aswell.