Re: Best Argument for Atheism

A response to Best Argument for Atheism.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• thegreatapologist
• religion
• debate
• atheism

[tiggster13]

You've accused mysterybox of basing his argument on assumptions but your entire rebuttal is based on the assumption that Christianity has more truth value than any other religion. Until you can support that assertion with actual facts your position has no validity ( and this is according to your standards as you presented them), and, thus, the original argument stands.

[thegreatapologist]

@tiggster13 I can't really think about how any of my argumentation was based upon the assumptions you described. All I did was illustrate some common sense premises and use examples.

[tiggster13]

Premise 1: Christians are capable of formulating arguments against other religions.

Premise 2: The arguments that Christians use against other religions can be applied to Christianity.

Conclusion: Christians cannot dismiss atheism and hold that their belief is the only valid belief.

You can't dismiss the argument as being false just because you can't comprehend it.

[thegreatapologist]

@tiggster13 I didn't dismiss his argument because of lack of clarity. The reason that I placed this argument in my video is to illustrate that any fault I might have in interpretation of his argument (which it appears there was none) is not my fault.

[aDislikeBot]

@thegreatapologist "we are limited in our comprehension" Very true, which is why humans feel the need to create gods to feel as though they can comprehend the universe, life, etc, when in reality, i'm sure the truth is alot more beautiful that all these fictional evil gods.

[johntheminecrafter]

and the 201 to 200 it only takes 1 apple to spoil the barrel

[johntheminecrafter]

god did not change u are taking bait from atheists lol

[johntheminecrafter]

u need to understand there is proof for christanity u just dont look for it lol

[tiggster13]

@thegreatapologist Then you cannot perceive right from wrong, all you can do is obey and pass the responsibility for your actions onto god.  If god tells you to murder, you go out and murder; if god tells you don't rape then you don't rape. You are nothing but a soulless machine blindly following orders.

To deviate from perfection is to be human, to follow your god is to be inhuman.

[thegreatapologist]

@tiggster13 Evil is a deviation from God. God permitting or even creating evil for use in some higher, yet unkown purpose, is not evil.

As for the incarnation, I will admit that as of right now, I do not fully understand it. This is true of a lot of things God does. we are limited in our comprehension, while God is not.

[tiggster13]

@MrApologician Man is not infinite. How can god be infinite and not infinite at the same time?

And "everywhere" includes not only all places but all of the places in between places and the places in between those places and so on, so the infinity clause would apply to Bramin.

[ApatheticOmniscience]

However, the belief for that person will be just as valid to them as yours are to you. It doesn't "prove" anything about the objective validity of their belief, but rather demonstrates how arbitrary they are.

[MrApologician]

@tiggster13 what is half of infinity....infinity if jesus is half man and half god yet has a nature of infinity he is fully man and fully god becuse of the fact that 1/2 of infinty=infinty the hinus say that bramin is seprate and everywhere which cannot be reconcelied or harmonized by the infinity clause.