Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Kimberly Cates Bill is rejected for discussion by the NH House.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
642 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 13, 2010

The NH house voted to not discuss a bill which would have made criminals guilty of home invasion murders subject to capital punishment. The bill was inspired by the murders of Kimberly Cates and the attempted murder of her 11 year old daughter.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • First they take away our guns, then they protect criminals.

  • The worst part of the House's action is that the Democrats marched in lockstep, like jack-booted Nazis, voting, in effect, for the PARTY, instead of voting their concience or the will of the people.

see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No wonder the Republicans took over in Nov 2010! The people of NH finally realized the snakes these vile Democrats are! They are the party of minorities and criminal only!

  • this is another reason why i hate democrats i hope they all burn in hell. I love kim sooooooooooooooooooooooo much and the rep's dont even give a shit about us

  • As laws goes this is one of the less bad...however how about trying a different approach. Instead of proposing a punishment that will boost taxpayer expense, maybe propose an elimination of certain laws that impose a chilling effect on self-defense. That would reduce both prosecutions, state expenditures, and crimes.

  • The house refused to even discuss the bill. A true sign of cowardness. How come the fine people of NH elected so many cowards?

  • There are good, principled reasons to believe the State does not have any power to kill one of its Citizens, no matter how heinous their crimes - the State does not create life, so it does not have the power to take away life.

    However, it does not hold therefore that the State has continued obligation to protect these miscreants from other members of society. Withdrawing State protection and the promise to prosecute violations of such would allow Society, not Government, to remedy the problem.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more