2004 World Main Battle Tank Ranking BEST 5

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
21,535
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 15, 2007

Forecast International 2004
—Re-evaluates Main Battle Tank Market—
http://www.forecastinternational.com/press/release.cfm?article=17

Forecast International
http://www.forecastinternational.com/

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Why is Challenger horrible?? Let me guess....Because it's not american??? CR2 has to be one of the best tanks, simply because of the fact it has never been destroyed by enemy fire...

  • this most be one of the worst list i ever sen leo 2 best

see all

All Comments (164)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MujaRagHeadKillaUK Challenger were great in armor warfare...it did not suffer single lost to enemy fire...but they think the gun on the tank were not make enemy truly fearful -_-

  • I would say 1)Abrams 2)Leo ll 3)Challenger ll 4) T90.

    Merkava in best 2?Pretty much funny.

  • ...story, but you didn't so we had to save your asses. WWII history is based on a bunch of half truths and lies anyway. The English and the French started WWII just like they started WWI. Why did the U.S. and the British allow the Soviet Union to invade Poland (just like Hitler did) and roll over all of eastern Europe? I thought our ancestors fought WWII to preserve freedom? Face it folks, your mainstream media paradigm of the world is a huge lie. There are no righteous wars.

  • @dANNNimal,

    Let's be realistic, you guys were done at Dunkirk. Hitler ordered his generals not to destroy your army. You were allowed to live to fight another day. Germany could have ended your part in the war at Dunkirk so stop acting like your guys are so tough. Without the United States Europe would have been toast, why is that so hard to admit? We had the guns and we had the numbers and we won the war in Europe, case closed. If you had had the guns and numbers it would have been a different

  • The M1A2 is the best? Ahaha dont make me laugh please.

    The Abrams is best at nothing!

  • @dANNNimal "years" of "fighting"..mmm?? where we these battles ON THE GROUND in Europe against Germany before WE arrived??..and Years???...mmm???..really?? you also didn't have the TANKS BOMBERS AMMUNITION and on and on....you can hem and haw all ya want...all historians know you'd be speaking German and Europe would of been over run by Stalin without the Presence of the USA...I'm sorry??did YOU establish WEST BERLIN?? Don't recall you there??..go get an education and come on back now, Hear!?

  • @dANNNimal oh..you were "winning" huh??? tell us all about how you were occupying Europe and pushing into Berlin all on your own...I do recall a disaster called Dunkirk where you tried to go it without big Daddy America and you had to leave all your weapons on the Beach and be rescued by fishing boats and rowboats..is that the "winning side WHAT A PATHETIC JOKE"...I wonder why Churchill begged and begged us for help when you were "winning"???..get fucking real Dude...you were LOSING

  • @mjw9363 "Why would we want to join yet ANOTHER European war???" well being the big hard ass super fighting warriors of the universe extreme you are, wouldnt u have jumped at the chance? you being the ones that never shy from a fight as you originally said brits do.....

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more