Bob Brown committing Treason

Bob Brown committing Treason
Bob Browns treason with his illegal plebiscite bill that removes the right to a referendum under the rules of constitution of Australia and replace it with a republic ,Totally illegal attempt to remove your rights liberties and freedoms to pave way for a UN communist dictatorship .

ELIJAHS CHALLENGE
Brian William Shaw is a man that is fighting for every ones freedom in the Australian courts, a real HERO for all Australians to look upon, stand up Australia or live on your knees as a Coward, its time to make a choice tyranny or freedom.

http://www.elijahschallenge.net/legal/Werribee/All%20Councillors%20Wyndham%20...

http://www.elijahschallenge.net/legal.htm

http://www.elijahschallenge.net/legal/attainted%20of%20treasom/Brief%20of%20E...

The difference between a plebiscite and a referendum is a plebiscite is a glorified opinion poll , a referendum the details are on the table before, and not after you vote.
Browns Republic Bill does not attempt to determine what model should be adopted or what powers the head of state should hold or operational and governance issues.

Bob Browns bill read It, before anyone makes more outlandish claims.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/bill/pfaarb2008354/

Governments can hold advisory referendums to test whether people either support or oppose a Republic..

Clause 6 of browns bill provides that the process for holding the plebiscite would follow by a second Plebiscite by amending /modifying the Application of Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984

I urge every one to research my claims rather than just spending a few minutes going to wikipedia and looking up what a plebiscite is , they are both a method of vote yes , but they are 2 different methods of vote and in Australia there are no provisions for the plebiscite in constitution law for the obvious reasons explained below.

Here is the 1999 bill for a republic that failed , tell me can you find the word plebiscite in this bill? http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bd/1998-99/99bd139.htm

Plebiscites have no basis in Australian Constitutional law. , discussion details will be only held after such a vote of support by the elector ,this is there TRICK.

From what I can gather only a discussion can be held AFTER an initial plebiscite vote for a Republic in favor of a yes vote ,only then a referendum will be held using a non binding second plebiscite vote and at that time you will get a choice of there models on what type of republic you want OR should I say what they want,,,A plebiscite is a non-binding poll that will be used to vote for a republic by deception.

In 1934 a plebiscite was held in Germany that supported the rise of Hitler

" Its a trick " your actual vote wont be a referendum vote with everything on the table from the word go ,rather it will be a NON transparent NON binding plebiscite vote.

The word plebiscite is NOT written in " Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984 " or any constitution past present.
http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/ActCompilation1.nsf/framelodgment...


The False Left Right Paradigm this system will destroy us
It doesn't matter who one votes for because they are all working for the Federal Reserve Bank NEW WORLD ORDER that calls ALL the shots.
The Federal Reserve Bank, UN Communists ,Fabian Socialists , and the Freemasons are involved in a Coo by criminal politicians to secretly remove the good government of Australia, they are attempting to dissolve the crown law regarding estate , rewriting certain state constitutions removing your property rights illegally without referendum . Illegal laws are being made covertly to take your freedoms and rights away, and if this plebiscite gets a yes vote it will tidy up all the illegal activity or should I say cover up criminal acts of " TREASON ".? YOU HAVE TO WAKE UP NOW AUSTRALIA.

Liberal, Labor, Greens are selling us out Australia
You have to wake up Australia Please.

Julia Gillard Concealing Treason there for committing treason.
http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/548/summons3.jpg
http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/22/summons2.jpg
http://www.elijahschallenge.net/legal/charges/Charge%20Gillard%20Filed%20%202...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• New World Order
• Kevin
• Rudd
• Julia.Gillard.
• Anna
• Maria
• Bligh
• penny wong
• Nicola Roxon
• Tony Abbott
• Julie Bishop
• stephen smith
• Greg Combet
• bob brown
• Kelvin Thomson
• Robert McClelland
• Dr Andrew Southcott
• Phillip Ruddock
• Wayne Swan
• barnarby joyce
• Bill Heffernan
• Joe Hockey.Nick Xenophon
• Steve Fielding
• chris back
• bob katter.Wilson Tuckey
• Malcolm.Turnbull
• Paul Lucas
• Stephen Robertson
• Bob
• Brown
• Kim
• Christian
• Beazley

[topgunexcel]

Why the hell are the politicians keen on a republic? Past examples should show the interest is for their own benefit or that of corporations. The people will decide when they want the name "republic" & using the constitution with precedents set by common law we will decide how to live in that republic

[chotaboy66]

@topgunexcel Why the hell are the politicians keen on a republic?

--

Thats easy to cover up their crimes of treason only If its done by referendum it will expose them all really ,thats why brown here is trying to pull this plebiscite trick that would allow then to bypass the procedures of a fully transparent referendum . Its not rocket science they're all crooks trying to cover up their crimes . Its only a matter of time now.

[cliptwingz]

People should see that significant moves can be made within modern politics in developed western society. Police should be concerned, but the Legislative should be only mildly bemused.

[chotaboy66]

@cliptwingz A society of an individual who robs another of the productivity of his effort or enslaves him or attempts to limit the freedom of his mind or compels him to act against his own rational judgment is not a society but a mob held together by institutionalized gang rule, such a society destroys the values of all human co existence ,has no possible justification & represents not a source of benefits but the deadliest threat to mans survival which is the removal of individual rights.

[i8uNWO]

Wow! 63 dislikes… 63 people liked having there constitutional rights taken from them? Or they just don’t have a fucking clue what just happened in this vid?

Better wake up Aussie…

[elvinsmatthew]

im all for losing the Monachy but not with the grens in im not

[funnyasfuc]

The greens are hardly going to define and improve freedoms for us we will be lobotomised for eating meat!

I see the sense in having our own head of stare but the people pushing for it are not to be trusted so i hope it stays the same for a generation or two.

Australia is already gone, i can hear its demise outside my door as i type.

[funnyasfuc]

As far as i'm concerned i am a citizen of The Commonwealth of Australia.

If this already voted down issue comes up and passes then people who want Australia to remian the same will have to decide whether or not to participate in the new australian order. ( "Oceanic Zone 1 of the Global Council"may be an appropriate name).

What is wrong with our constitution? What good is a bill of rights when it can be ammended or ignored.

The greens are hardly going to define and improve freedoms for us we wi

[theScienceOfFear2012]

fuck bob brown!

[chotaboy66]

@brendanraymond A1; Because we are both, a monarchist defacto Fabian fascist republic by stealth with no bill of rights.

A2: Only if we have an open transparent referendum where all the cards are on the table first before we vote but this will never happen because it will expose A1 :)

[brendanraymond]

@DamianFinch Q1: Why arn't we a republic with a bill of rights yet?

Q2: Do you think we should become a republic?

Just after your personal opinion.

[cliptwingz]

Re the below, what is going on with the tube these days. ""@chotaboy66""