Astrotheology in the bible 10 Mazzerroth, zodiac, astrology, allegory, hiding in the bible!

Santos Bonacci explains how all the Ancient Legendary Stories, Myths, Bibles, Fairy Tales etc all have one simple common origin. In all the wonderful ancient stories, the Dramitis Personae are always the same, under different names. Eg: The Sun, Hercules, Jesus, Krishna, Little Red Ridding Hood, Prince Charming etc, are all one and the same Person/Entity. All the characters have the same roles, the same adventures and the same trials and Labours. The Seven visible planets and luminaries (The Active Creator God's) in our Solar System considered to be a Macrocosmic Atom, the Twelve Constellations of The Zodiac, the numbers Three and Four are also important. Four is the number of the elements, Fire, Air, Water, and Earth which correspond to Light/Heat, Gas, Liquid and Solid, the building blocks of the Universe. It is possible to explain every verse in the Bible with Science and Astronomy and Physics etc.

Santos Bonacci
http://www.universaltruthschool.com

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• zodiac
• astrology
• allegory
• hiding in the bible!

[wubabooya]

Thats so cool - im sorry but i cant get anything out of the universaltruthschool page :-( i need more knowledge ithink! or maybe i need to open them chakras or access them - but how to get there???

help!

[oxiigen]

Fantastic lecture indeed! Thank you!

[davids11131113]

@a0eoj Well the point is more that the bible is full of mathematics and physics, how about the '144,000 elect'? Yea, more like the 'elect'-ricity which powers everything, its all electricity. The suns rays from electrical activity on the sun = 144,000, 'C" tone 144 Hz, which is a perfect harmonic of the speed of light, 144,000 MOA per earth grid second, half of this harmonic is 72 which is also EVERYWHERE in the Bible.

[davids11131113]

@watchersx 'The collapse of religious faiths' is due to a mind awakening of peoples, due to a changing age...thats what all this is about really, and the El-ites panic over their loss of control.

[davids11131113]

@a0eoj You're just trying to be a 'debunker', no one here said anything about 'space aliens'. I only asked why would it be 3,000 years ago people decided to build giant structures using 1,000 ton stone blocks (the largest estimated) ...now you say 'Well here some people say it COULD theoretically using drills and sand etc...those people also say it would take 20 or 30 years to cut out just one of those blocks...so why would they do that when the same thing could be done using far smaller ones?

[davids11131113]

@a0eoj No there isnt, now youre just saying things like 'Well, you should go investigate yourself, you should go to Egypt and see the pyramids'...well, I have, and have read basically every book an ancient buildings and architecture, so your method of saying I simply dont know what Im talking about shows you cant make your point and in fact I do know what Im talking about. You keep throwing in 'space aliens' into your statements well you said that, I never did.

[a0eoj]

Even though some scholars may disagree about specific methods used to cut, move and place the stones, no reputable scholar suggests space aliens were involved in building the pyramids. It's only crackpots, pseudo-scientists and science fiction writers who hypothesize non-sense like that.

[a0eoj]

@davids11131113 Maybe you should visit the pyramids so you won't keep making false assertions like the "granite blocks fit so tightly that no measurable joint is present." Not only are there many measurable gaps, many are quite visible to the naked eye.

[a0eoj]

@davids11131113 There's plenty of information concerning the quarries, tools used to cut stone in the quarries, transportation of the stone to the monument, and leveling the foundation and subsequent tiers of the superstructure. Workmen probably used copper chisels, drills, and saws to cut softer stone, such as most of the limestone. The harder stones such as granite can't be cut with copper tools alone, but they can be drilled and sawed with the aid of an abrasive such as quartz sand.

[a0eoj]

@davids11131113

Isler, Martin - Sticks, stones, and shadows: building the Egyptian pyramids - University of Oklahoma Press

Stocks, Denys A. - Experiments in Egyptian archaeology: stoneworking technology in ancient Egypt - Routledge

Nicholson, Paul T; Ian Shaw - Ancient Egyptian materials and technology - Cambridge University Press

Edwards, Stephen; John Cruikshank Rose - The Pyramids of Egypt

Arnold, Dieter - Building in Egypt: Pharaonic Stone Masonry - Oxford University Press

[davids11131113]

@a0eoj LIST the names of those you speak of, who can totaly tell us about EXACTLY how people 3,000 years ago who supposedly had leather sandals and at best bronze hand tools built structures with 100 ton granite blocks fit so tightly that no measurable joint is present? What are their names and titles of their books? Youre now just trying to change the subject.

[a0eoj]

@davids11131113 Just because ancient people were smarter than you doesn't mean building pyramids requires some magical process. If the Egyptians didn't build the pyramids, who did? Space aliens? Yeah, that's probably more likely - LOL

[davids11131113]

@a0eoj WELL since youre telling me Im so wrong, and many can easily explain exactly how bronze tool users built these massive pyramids and other structures a few thousand years ago all over the world...list these books where its explained...and NOT some 'theories' but the exact plans and methods people with brass and iron tools could have built them all, SO perfectly? Titles and authors please, and I'll go read these works explaining it all.

[davids11131113]

@a0eoj No, they cant. And these are in far more places than just in Egypt....how about in Lebanon where 3,000 year old structures stand made out of stone blocks the size of school busses so precisely fit on all edges that there is no measurable gap? Im sorry, youre just off base here, they CANT explain at all how many ancient structures were built even today, but you can go on thinking whatever.

[a0eoj]

@davids11131113 Maybe those "top architects" aren't as TOP as you think; engineers can explain precisely how the pyramids could have been built. What do you mean by PRE-CUT? So what if passages point to astronomical features? I'd be more surprised if Egyptians had labored so intensively without including such features. Lasers aren't necessary for leveling; water and gravity will do the trick, both of which were available to the Egyptians. The pyramids really aren't as mysterious as you think.

[davids11131113]

@a0eoj Yes Im sure about that, Ive seen the top architects and engineers surveying the pyramids and admitting they dont know how it was done then at all, supposedly with bronze tools, at best. Nevermind stacking some blocks and making pyramids, those giant stones were PRE-CUT with passages that point to astronomical features. There are perfectly flat and level surfaces that are MORE precise than TODAYS best laser lab tables.

[a0eoj]

@davids11131113 Are you sure about that? Have we really forgotten how to cut stone or have we perfected our ability? In our haste to reach the moon, did we forget how to stack rocks? Do you think we sent all our crane operators to the moon?

[davids11131113]

Thanks Santos, much enjoyed.

[davids11131113]

@a0eoj And yet we still cant re-create the pyramids today, not the way they were built back then. Huh.

[SethVincent]

I have studied & re-searched Astro-Theology for about four of five years. . . this guy is the most thorough & detailed of any-one I have heard. . . !

[a0eoj]

The ratio 265:153 = 1.7320261... is merely a bronze-age approximation of the square root of 3, which may have boggled the minds of Pythagorus and Archimedes, but any mystical significance of 153 and the vesica piscis has been rather insignificant since the discovery of better methods to represent irrational numbers. The mathematical ratio of the width of the vesica piscis to its height is precisely the square root of 3, or 1.7320508...

What's next, the cult of pi?

[a0eoj]

153 isn't a measurement; it's simply a number (within a ratio of numbers - 265:153 = 1.7320261) often referring to the vesica piscis, a shape that is the intersection of two circles with the same radius, intersecting in such a way that the center of each circle lies on the circumference of the other. The name literally means the "bladder of a fish" in Latin.

[a0eoj]

Not to argue astrological references within the Bible, but contrary to the assertion that Christian authorities were already aware of, and simply wanted to keep secret, the helio-centric model of the solar system prior to Copernicus and Galileo, doesn't it make more sense that ignorant religious authorities were simply upset with Galileo for confronting them with evidence which contradicted their silly astrological models of a geo-centric universe?

[a0eoj]

153 is the measurement of the fish?

[a0eoj]

Although Thomas Paine is famous for writing "The Age of Reason" and the book is freely available online, the quote attributed to Paine @ 02:05 in this video isn't in "The Age of Reason." Rather, the quote, "The Christian religion is a parody on the worship of the sun, in which they put a man called Christ in the place of the sun, and pay him the adoration originally payed to the sun," can be found in "An Essay on the Origin of Free-Masonry" by the same Thomas Paine.