Portrait of an Atheist: InModiasWeTrust

My Blog: http://www.hubpages.com/profile/InModiasWeTrust ... Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/InModiasWeTrust ... If you're not already aware, Eimajuno's channel has been terminated for false flagging! Whether or not you know Juno, I recommend that you check out his other channel, JunosDen ( http://www.youtube.com/user/junosden ). He is very funny and does satirical videos as well as philosophical discussions and pwnage.
Tagged by Sarahon ( http://www.youtube.com/user/Sarahon06 ). I was surprised in doing this that my answers were as similar to Sarahon's as they turned out to be, but oh well. This latest tag series asks atheists to discuss the following topics: 1- Abortion; 2- Capital Punishment; 3- Drug Laws; 4- Gay Rights; 5- Economics... I had to be more brief than I would have preferred because I am getting ready for work and I am almost out of battery power for my camcorder. The following people are tagged: 1- DynamiteRuby ( http://www.youtube.com/user/dynamiteruby ), 2- Eimajuno or JunosDen ( http://www.youtube.com/user/junosden ), 3- Orygyn ( http://www.youtube.com/user/orygyn ), 4- SuperFlyNB ( http://www.youtube.com/user/superflynb ) and 5- Tattooskin72 ( http://www.youtube.com/user/tattooskin72 ). If you have already been tagged, I'm sorry if I missed it. As many of you know, I have been away for a while. Anyway, thanks for watching and I hope you enjoy!!

-Modias

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Modias
• InModiasWeTrust
• portrait
• atheist
• blog
• hubpages
• twitter
• Eimajuno
• Junosden
• channel
• terminated
• false
• flagging
• YT
• YouTube
• cheating
• Juno
• new
• funny
• satirical
• philosophical
• pwnage
• Sarahon06
• tag
• tagged
• surprised
• answers
• questions
• atheism
• theist
• theism
• religion
• topics
• abortion
• capital
• punishment
• drug
• laws
• gay
• rights
• economics
• brief
• work
• battery
• DynamiteRuby
• JunosDen
• Orygyn
• SuperFlyNB
• Tattooskin72

[singsomuch]

Great portrait, my friend!

[InModiasWeTrust]

Why thank you! If I had thought of it, I would have tagged you as well...

[ReverendAtomSmasher]

BTW, I enjoyed your responses.

[InModiasWeTrust]

Thx!

[ReverendAtomSmasher]

Where ya been kid? Great vid!

[InModiasWeTrust]

Working, writing, reading and brooding about my shitty internet connection. I will be moving again soon, but this time to a permanent location with good, steady internet! Missed ya, amigo...

[daveoftheweek]

I made one of these. I would say the fetus gains rights as soon as it gains consciousness of it's surroundings. That being said, if there's a situation where it's the woman's right over the fetus right, I would choose the woman. I think, as Hitchens said, rather than make abortion outright illegal, we should just work on making sure there's technology that makes the fetus viable at an earlier stage.

[PrinceOfDoubt]

well, babies don't breath or open their mouths when they are in the the womb so they don't taste or smell, their eyes aren't open so they can't see, they might be able to hear or fell but i'm not sure,

but babies really don't know what's going on anyway

[TruthSurge]

But what if we KNEW that the woman's fetus was in fact a new messiah that would save us all from Jesus??? We'd have to step in and stop her from aborting him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hehehe

AC on 25 hrs a day? Hell, it gets hot in NC.

[Heathenfidel]

How about: When its brain is sufficiently developed to allow consciousness.

[debbieomi]

P.S. Good to see you back.

[debbieomi]

If you have the time or inclination, I have a playlist of 40 some Portraits of an Atheist on my channel.

There has been little deviation in opinion on these five subjects for most who have done these portraits. With all the atheists I sub to or run into on blogtv, etc with the exception of maybe two, we are are liberals, so it leads to reason that our opinions would be in the same ballpark. I think Agman should have come up with more diverse topics to get the result he was looking for. oh well

[horny4bears]

@2:20

Are these thoughts no-brainers or just considered outside the scope of abortion, for no one touches on these area's that keep coming to mind when I hear others mentioning this subject:

if given her the full rights to choose,which I agree with, why the double standard to punish the man involved with docking their pay?Are they willing to give up this 'clause' for their 'right' to choose?

Also how should it be handled when the pregnancy is used as extortion?Charge her with blackmail?

sigh

[thergonomic]

Ok, I think that you understood me abit wrong. What I meant that if C-Section is possible, as in the fetus is able to live outside the womb with medical help it would be preferable to do it than not to. Since you did say that you count that life begins when the fetus is able to live outside the womb without medical help. That's the reason for my comment. I just think that it's better to give a chance for the child than not to. But if C-Section isn't possible for some reason I am for abortion.

[tattooskin72]

hmmm, video isn't working for me :(

[freethinker3161]

i do agree it is a medical procedure but late term is just not my thing.