Roger Federer v David Nalbandian: 2005 TMC RR1 highlights
Top Comments
All Comments (20)
-
Why don't you actually learn to read people's posts before attacking them?
If you read what I posted, you'll see that I didn't make excuses for Federer being injured and gave credit to Nalbandian's win.
Idiot.
-
@Ryan81M - your comment about Federer ;and blaming all of his losses on injury is absolute BS..
-
ajajjajajaja.
everyboy knows that about Roger the journalists on Tv are all the time talking about him, and you have internet also.
And you jump from a case to other, i give a shit of what nalbandian have won. im talking about the head to head between him and Federer.
-
oh yeah? and that was when roger was just beginning to become what he is now. and tell me "i " dont know anything about tennis, so you tell me because is nalbandian has ever been ranked 1 for 4 years and 8 months, won 60 titles, 15 grands slams, 15 masters series, 4 masters cup and broke lots of other records i never noticed. that is the prove that your not only a sttuborn nalbda fan but that your comments was nothing but a sign of ignorance. my statements are REAL FACTS.
-
you say bullshits.
Nalbandian have won to federer in australia and monte carlo tournaments and both of them are in the begining of the year.
ITS CLEARLY THAT YOU DONT KNOW A SHIT ABOUT TENNIS AND YOURE ONLY A ROGER FAN
OKEY IM GOING TO GIVE YOU A GOOD NEW HE IS THE BEST ON HISTORY SO "BE QUIETTTTT"
-
get yourself properly informed before giving your opinion. roger ended that season with perfect numbers, like always in his "constant" carreer, showing class and perfect tennis. not the case of nalbandian that never beats top ten players in the first hald of the year. he always beat them in the second half on the season when everyone is exhausted. so i dont see talent there, just a man who take advantage of somebody else's tiredness.
-
stop saying bullshits.
you say that because youre roger fan.
roger only lost that final in that year and he won the us open, and wimbledon so he didnt have nothing.
nalbandian played better and won him
-
Federer was serving for the match and up 30:0 and even playing amazing tennis...
-
in the final match nalbandian was lucky that roger had an ankle injury,
Listen, let's not become like some Rafa fans: if Roger loses, it was because he was injured. Both Nalby and himself played amazing tennis and Nalby was just that bit better on the day. He is an unbelievable talent and so let's not take anything away from his win.
Ryan81M 2 years ago 5
... so its a bad idea to wish someone great fortune. its just a match lighten up.
karimcartoon 4 years ago 4