World Bank "Lends" Hand to Population Control Effort

According to two subsequent documents put out by the World Bank, its guidelines dictate that in order to qualify for World Bank lending, sovereign nations must implement population reduction objectives as outlined by the World Bank and UN Population Fund. If they refuse, lending will be withdrawn.

Already pre-tested and implemented in Yemen and Niger, these guidelines are destined for global implementation within the next decade, says the World Bank.

In the World Bank's Reproductive Health Action Plan 2010-2015, published in April of 2010, the Bank speaks of Millennium Development Goal number 5 (or MDG5), which stands for "Reproductive Health" (or RH).

As we know, this is eugenics-new-speak for population control. As pro-death globalist professor John Cleland argued at a 2006 gathering in the company of like-minded individuals from the United Nations Population Fund, the International Planned Parenthood Foundation, the European Commission, the World Bank and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation:

"It does this cause no service at all to continue to shroud family planning in the obfuscating phrase "sexual and reproductive health". People don't really know what it means. If we mean family planning or contraception, we must say it. If we are worried about population growth, we must say it. We must use proper, straightforward language. I am fed up with the political correctness that daren't say the name population stabilization, hardly dares to mention family planning or contraception out of fear that somebody is going to get offended. It is pathetic!"

The 2010 report put out by the World Bank however, chooses to use this deceptive phrase continually. And, from its dark point of view, it is right to do so- for the resistance against this 21st century eugenics grows steadily. The Bank, just like the UN, has no choice but to cloak itself in deceptive language so as not to raise too much suspicion as they move forward:

"(...) a renewed global consensus on the need to make progress on MDG5, together with greater attention to gender issues within and outside the Bank is refocusing attention on RH and offering an unprecedented opportunity to redress the neglect of the previous decade. Notable among these developments is that in 2007 the UN fully incorporated RH within the MDG framework."
http://www.infowars.com/un-world-bank...
by Jurriaan Maessen

http://explosivereports.com/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
http://twitter.com/#!/RealAlexJones
http://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEmer...

• Category

  News & Politics

[caroline gay]

World Bank suck. I didn't realize my Victoria's Secret credit card was from World Bank until I got my first Bill in the mail. Canceling it now!!

[Draekkus]

Anyone see Grindhouse? This guy is totally Doc Block lol..

[Outboundz]

mankind should have thought of this before creating a economical system that needs %pop. growth, those in power knew this day would come but none them wanted see all the things that are happening now in th world. so they kept delaying it. the family's in power should step down as payment for their mistake of creating these systems(

kapitalism and communism)

[Outboundz]

cause most are not co-operating and are spreading negativity

[whitesmith bonesdark]

Pop control will only be bad when they take away our ability to have sex with internet videos...until then....what's wrong???

[88aingeal]

Gardasil vaccine programme in schools is a sterilzation programme

[RamboRepublican]

Hmmm, I usually don't talk to mentally disabled people but let me politely explain this to you. In order for the population to decrease, nobody needs to be killed. People merely need to have fewer children than they currently do, especially in developing countries.

You would greatly benefit from enrolling in some college classes and learning how to calmly address problems without suffering from irrational paranoia attacks.

[trekster7777]

So, are you going to help by doing the earth a favor and end your life? Or, are you NOT part of the problem - just other people? How about any children you have or plan to have? WHO is going to choose WHO is WORTHY of life? Or to have children?  YOU? And by what standards? How would you like those same rules applied to YOU and YOUR FAMILY? Those that say we should have population decrease never think that they are part of the problem and would never make the ultimate sacrifice themselves.

[hablerz]

Lol. Trust me im not a Marxist. Quite the opposite. The planet is a self regulating environment, thats self regulating not Man regulating. The Earth is virtually empty and it has an abundance of resources and Man is one of the most resourceful creatures there is. You should be asking yourself why you would want to wipe people out in the first place.

[RamboRepublican]

Spoken like a true armchair-Marxist with no formal education in ecology.

[hablerz]

No it means some rich guy like Ted Turner owns millions of acres while someone else less fortunate owns zero land and is reliant on state handouts. Look at the Earths potential , we're not even using 1 percent.

[RamboRepublican]

"Resource mismanagement" = overpoulation.