A case for Intelligent Design? - The Atheist Experience #660

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
40,372
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 27, 2010

In June 2010, Gary from Manhattan, NY tried to make a case for Intelligent Design. This soon turned into a long and heated debate of almost 39 minutes. At the time this call was too long to be uploaded in one piece, but now you can watch the whole discussion in its entirety.

This is a segment from The Atheist Experience #660 of June 6, 2010 (topic: viewer calls), with Matt Dillahuny and Martin Wagner. Note that the phone number on the screen (512-472-2255) is the new call-in number, which has been in use since October 2010. This episode of The Atheist Experience is archived on Blip.tv. (The recorded webcast on Ustream.tv is fragmented and incomplete.)

http://www.blip.tv/file/3723586 (television broadcast)
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7492057 (webcast, incomplete)

More shows and video clips can be found in the archive:
http://www.atheist-experience.com/archive

DVDs of the Atheist Experience can be purchased via:
http://www.atheist-community.org/products


WHAT IS THE ATHEIST EXPERIENCE?

The Atheist Experience is a weekly cable access television show in Austin, Texas geared at a non-atheist audience. The Atheist Experience is produced by the Atheist Community of Austin. The Atheist Community of Austin is organized as a nonprofit educational corporation to develop and support the atheist community, to provide opportunities for socializing and friendship, to promote secular viewpoints, to encourage positive atheist culture, to defend the first amendment principle of state-church separation, to oppose discrimination against atheists and to work with other organizations in pursuit of common goals.


NOTES

TheAtheistExperience is a fan appreciation channel on YouTube.
"The Atheist Experience" is a registered trademark of the ACA.

Creative Commons license: BY, NC, SA
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0

  • likes, 21 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TheAtheistExperience)

  • 35:49

    What.

    Why is that picture their "picture lost" screen?

  • @gimmethegepgun

    - "What. Why is that picture their 'picture lost' screen?"

    It's fake, but funnier than a completely black screen.

  • before the big band time did not exsist, so it leaves no room for god.

  • @MrNerdyBrit

    - "before the big band time did not exsist, so it leaves no room for god."

    Are you referring to the Glenn Miller-Urey experiment...?

    Never mind, but I think you meant Big Bang. :)

Top Comments

  • Here's the bottom line: You don't have to "believe" in evolution to be an atheist. You don't have to be a scientist, or to even understand science, to be an atheist. And here's some common sense: IF there is a creator of this vast, incredibly massive universe, it was very definitely NOT created by the tiny narcissistic, ignorant, hateful, war loving, child killing, genocidal psychotic maniac called Yahweh/Jesus you find in the the Bible. Earthlings discovering god? That's too fucking funny!

see all

All Comments (1,055)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @politicoochie09 Very good!

    Could not have said it better myself..

  • "I reject absolute certainty across the board."

    That's humor.

  • This caller is obviously a very smart guy....why is he clinging so desperately to this mythology??? Why not just accept the reality?

  • If the christian god, or any god, exists one would expect to see direct evidence, but there is none. Behe had the opportunity to make his case for ID at the Dover trial, and failed miserably. ID supporters want to redefine the rules of science to include the "supernatural" because actual science doesn't support any of their claims. The "Wedge Document" is the smoking gun that proves that the goal of ID advocates is to replace science with religious dogma, knowledge with ignorance.

  • @ScarsFTW

    True. That, and without an explanation for how the world could become so complex (evolution), some people would use an argument from ignorance to claim it is impossible.

  • Existence is temporal. Meaning if you define "god" as "outside of time and space", you have just described a nonexistent entity by definition.

  • 98% of every species that has ever lived on the planet has become extinct. Some design!

    The brain inside this callers head, some design.

  • @kakureru I don't think he's all that smart, onehe allowed the glasses to bypass all the logic when he was looking up the jargon needed to try & trick people with word play. I don't even think he tried to understand the arguement from both side. He set out to find things to prove what he wanted to believe rather than actually reveiwing evidence that's clearly out there for him. He's a fraud. Most con artist are a little smarter than most, which is not that hard in this society.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more